Anderson Ltd v Daniel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1924 |
| Date | 1924 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
42 cases
- Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn Bhd; Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
- YK Fung Securities Sdn Bhd v James Capel (Far East) Ltd
-
Shaw v Groom
...be an offence in the case of the agent. This difference is, in my judgment, immaterial. The learned judge relied mainly on the case of Anderson v. Daniel (1924-1 King's Bench 138), which was decision: of the Court of Appeal and certainlyat first reading seems directly in point. In that case......
-
Marles v Philip Trant & Sons Ltd (no 2)
...led to the damage. 8 The argument advanced on behalf of the third party gains support from the decision of this court in the case of Anderson, Ltd. V. Daniel, reported in 1924 1 king's Bench Division at page 138, in which the plaintiffs had sold something which fell within the provisions of......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Ex Turpi Causa: Reformation not Revolution
...infringed (Proposition 2(a)), or barred77 See, for example, Burrows vRhodes [1899] 1 QB 816.78 See, for example, Anderson Ltd vDaniel [1924] 1 KB 138. Devlin J said in St John ShippingCorpn vJoseph Rank Ltd [1957] 1 QB 267 that the claim in Anderson failed because the contractwas prohibited......