Anderson v Hogg
Jurisdiction | Scotland |
Date | 2000 |
Court | Court of Session (Outer House) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Clark v Cutland
...with which the petition had been consolidated. The same view of the law was taken by the Inner House of the Court of Session in Anderson v Hogg [2002] BCC 933. Preliminary 9 A preliminary point arises as to whether the appeal in this case can proceed at all. Mr Thomas Seymour, for Mr Cutlan......
-
Fisher v Cadman and Others
...about how the controllers of the company ought to behave to be derived from a simple reading of the Articles of Association. 91 Anderson v Hogg 2000 SLT 634 , a decision of the Outer House of the Court of Session (Lord Reed) on s. 459, provides an example of this approach being applied. ......
-
Alexander Marshall Wishart V. Castlecroft Securities Limited And Others
...committed wrongs against it. The relevant Scottish authorities were discussed in two recent decisions of the Outer House: Anderson v Hogg 2000 SLT 634 (and, on appeal, 2002 SC 190) and Wilson v Inverness Retail and Business Park Ltd 2003 SLT 301. The law in Scotland achieved a similar pract......
-
Southern Counties Fresh Food Ltd Between: Cobden Investments Ltd v RWM Langport Ltd & Others
...of acquiescence which may have led those in control of the company to act or continue to act in a particular way” citing Anderson v Hogg (2000) SLT 634 at 639–40 and Fisher v Cadman [2006] 1 BCLC 499 at 528g para 90. In a case of waiver or acquiescence, it may be open, in accordance with we......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
No reflective loss: The English approach reconsidered
...supra note 42.234 Donoghue supra note 1.235 See the Outer House of the Court of Session’s argument in Scottish case of Anderson v Hogg 2000 SLT 634 at 644 (per Lord Ordinary).236 For instance, s 994 is not suitable to an oppressed controlling shareholder who seeks to pursue the company’s wr......
-
Statutory Derivative Proceedings in Scotland: A Procedural Impasse?
...company.33Orr v Glasgow etc Railway Co (1860) 3 Macq 799; Lee v Crawford (1890) 17 R 1094; Hannay v Muir (1898) 1 F 306; Anderson v Hogg 2000 SLT 634; Wilson & Docherty v Inverness Retail & Business Park Ltd & Shaw 2003 SLT 301; A A Paterson “The derivative action in Scotland” 1982 SLT (New......
-
Professor Sir TB Smit en die Ontwikkeling van die Skotse Reg, Oftewel, wat maak ’n Regsakademikus Suksesvol?
...idee dat die Court of Session (die Skotse hoe¨hof), ’nsogenaamde ‘‘equitable jurisdiction’’ geniet. Teen die agtergrond vanAnderson v Hogg 2000 SLT 634 (OH), wat handel oor die remedies vanminderheidsaandeelhouers, vra Whitty tereg hoekom so ’n sterkvoorstander van die siviele reg soos Smit......