Anderson v Hunter
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 1893 |
| Year | 1893 |
| Court | Court of Session (Inner House - First Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
985 cases
- Stephen Stubbs v R
- Gabriele Volpi v Delanson Services Ltd
-
Caribbean Cement Company Ltd v Freight Management Ltd
...to refuse to consider certain documentary evidence was fully supported by several authorities including the decisions in Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 and Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 70 FLR 447 and more recently in the UK Court of Appeal decision......
- Epsilon Global Equities Ltd v Paul Hoo
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Construction & Infrastructure News 9 May 2017
...is open – No sufficient basis for inferences and findings made – Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336, Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67. DAMAGES – Quantification of loss and damage – Damages for loss of opportunity – Court must ask whether there was a commercial opportunity o......
-
English High Court Sets Aside Award For Failure To Properly Cross-Examine A Witness On A Core Issue And Basing Its Decision On Matters Not Properly Argued By The Parties
...the meeting", despite the decision by D's counsel not to put D's case regarding the meeting to Mr E. P argued, relying on Browne v Dunn [1894] 6 R 57, that where there is a challenge to a witness on a core issue as to credibility, it ought to be put in cross-examination to that witness and ......
-
English High Court Sets Aside International Arbitral Award for Failure to Comply with English Rule in Browne v. Dunn
...is different to that adopted in English litigation, in which parties are typically required to comply with the rule in Browne v. Dunn [1894] 6 R 57. The rule provides that if a party intends to challenge the credibility of a witness’ testimony on a particular point, it must challenge the wi......
-
P v D Arbitration Claims Under Section 68 And 33 Of The Arbitration Act 1996
...instructing Richard Morgan QC of Maitland Chambers and Nicholas Craig QC of 3 Verulam Buildings. Footnotes [2019] EWHC 1277 (Comm) (1893) 6 R 67) The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
2 books & journal articles
-
Discretion in the exercise of jurisdiction in conflict cases in Nigeria
...v FOB Investment and Properties Ltd & Anor (2001) 6 NWLR (Pt. 708) 246.Saraki & Anor v Kotoye [1992] NWLR (Pt. 264) 156.Sim v Robinow (1892) 19 R 665 (Sess Cas 1892) (Scot).Sinochem International Co Ltd v Malaysia International Shipping Corp 549 US 5 (2007).Smith Kline & French Lab Ltd v Bl......
-
Balancing fairness to victims, society and defendants in the cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses: an impossible triangulation?
...(27 November 2010) r 37; Bar Standards Board, Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales (8th ed, 31 October 2004) r 303(a). (81) (1894) 6 R 67, 70-1 (Lord Halsbury). See also Du Cann, above n 58, 107; Glissan, above n 1, 81. (82) Law Council of Australia, Australian Solicitors' Conduc......