Angelo v Angelo

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1967
Date1967

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Mather v Mahoney
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Indyka v. Indyka [1967] 3 W.L.R. 510; [1967] 2 All E.R. 689, H.L.(E.); Angelo v. Angelo [1968] 1 W.L.R. 401; [1967] 3 All E.R. 314 followed ... The husband, though born in Scotland, was domiciled in England. The wife had lived ... ...
  • Kd (Otherwise C) v Mc
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1987
    ...L.B. v. H.B. [1980] I.L.R.M. 257. Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier [1895] A.C. 517. Niboyet v. Niboyet (1878) 4 P.D. 1. Angelo v. Angelo [1968] 1 W.L.R. 401; [1967] 3 All E.R. 314. Perrini v. Perrini [1979] Fam. 84; [1979] 2 W.L.R. 472; [1979] 2 All E.R. 323. Suko v. Suko (1971) Aust. L.R. 64. Ki......
  • Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...[1904] A.C. 287, H.L.(E.). The following additional cases were cited in argument: Angelo v. Angelo [1968] 1 W.L.R. 401; [1967] 3 All E.R. 314. Mayfield v. Mayfield [1969] P. 119; [1969] 2 W.L.R. 1002; [1969] 2 All E.R. Qureshi v. Qureshi [1971] 2 W.L.R. 518; [1971] 1 All E.R. 325. Sheffield......
  • Brown v Brown
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... HolleyF3 cannot be satisfied. He reminded me of the decision of Ormrod J. in Angelo v. Angelo,F4 and invited me to apply that principle in this case. The only matter that gave me any occasion for real consideration is whether having ... ...
  • Get Started for Free