Angus v Clifford

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1891
Date1891

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
76 cases
  • Nationwide Building Society v Dunlop Haywards Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 February 2009
    ... ... 46 The elements of the tort of deceit are well established: Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 , Angus v Clifford [1891] 2 Ch 449 , Armstrong v Strain [1951] 1 TLR 856 , The Kriti Palm [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 667. I would summarise them as ... ...
  • Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 June 2010
    ... ... It is for that reason that there is “proof of fraud” in the cases of both knowledge and recklessness. This was stressed by Bowen LJ in Angus v. Clifford [1891] 2 Ch 449 where he said (at 471): “Not caring, in that context, did not mean not taking care, it meant indifference ... ...
  • Madoff Securities International Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Stephen Raven and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 October 2013
    ...truth, the moral obloquy of which consists in a wilful disregard of the importance of truth: see per Bowen LJ in Angus v Clifford [1891] 2 Ch 449, 471. 178 Mr Flax explained that at the very beginning of Phase 3 it was agreed between Mr Yates and the auditors that the expression market maki......
  • Akerhielm v De Mare
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Derry v. Peek ( 1889 ) 14 App.Cas. 337 ; 5 T.L.R. 625 ; Angus v. Clifford [ 1891 ] 2 Ch. 449 ; 7 T.L.R. 447 , and Lees v. Tod ( 1882 ) 9 Rettie 807 , 854 applied ... Arnison v. Smith ( ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • A Probative Argument of Intention
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 87-5-6, December 2023
    • 1 December 2023
    ...the meaning of crime and punishment, see Pihlajamäki and Korpiola (n 9) 217.57. Spencer and Pedain (n 41) 251.58. Angus v Clifford [1891] 2 Ch. 449 at 471; S v Dlodlo 1966 (2) SA 401 (A) 405G –H; R v Ndhlovu 1945 AD 369 at 386 (‘Thesubjective state of mind of an accused person…is not ordina......