Aoun v Bahri and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Apex Global Management Ltd and Another (Claimants/Petitioners) v Fi Call Ltd and Others
...required to show that the steps were taken with the specific intention of defeating enforcement ( Aoun v Bahri [2002] EWHC 29 (Comm); [2002] 3 All E.R. 182) or that those steps were taken during the litigation or in contemplation of it ( Harris v Wallis, [2006] EWHC 630 (Ch); The Times, M......
-
Oleg Rostislavovich Kolyada v Ilya Sergeevich Yurov
...against those assets difficult. Of course, motivation is not a relevant consideration under CPR 25.13(2)(g) – see Aoun v Bahri [2002] 3 All ER 182. Nevertheless, that is the position, and Mr Kolyada's very frank evidence in that regard shows that Mr Kolyada is a financially sophisticated pe......
-
Harris v Wallis
...making it more difficult to enforce an order for costs. That contention had been rejected by Mr Justice Moore-Bick in Aoun v BahriUNK ((2002) 3 All ER 182). His Lordship was satisfied that decision was right and it was therefore his duty to follow it. Paragraph 2(g) had been deliberately dr......
-
Paragon Investments Inc. v Sharma
...to go into the judge did not consider that he needed to come to any conclusion on the point. Mr Justice Moore-Bick in a later case, called Aoun v Bahri [2002] 3 All ER 182, considered that it was not permissible to read any intent into paragraph (g), and that the words should be taken quite......