Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc. [ChD]
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Mr Justice Mann |
| Judgment Date | 07 April 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 768 (Ch) |
| Docket Number | Case No: HC-2003-C02428 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Date | 07 April 2004 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
Conductive Inkjet Technology Ltd v Uni-pixel Displays Inc.
...clear that Xennia/CIT had proposed an English law and jurisdiction clause, to which UPD would not agree. 72 In Apple Corps v Apple Computer [2004] EWHC 768 (Ch), [2004] 2 CLC 720, Mann J held that it is possible in principle for a contract to be made in two places at once, so that if one of......
-
Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd
...Solicitors' Journal 37 SOL JO 324; the Weekly Reporter ( 41 WR 455); The Law Times ( 68 LT 512); Justice of the Peace ( 57 JP 583); Times Law Reports (9 TLR 313); Law Journal ( 63 LJ QB 25); and Reports ( 4 R 317). A version reproduced in the All England Reprint 1558–1935, a series collated......
-
Jennifer Prescott Claimant v Aldrick Parris John Primus Defendants [ECSC]
...Slade J. said: "Paraphrasing the words of Lord Uthwatt inLondon Passenger Transport Board v. Upson [1949] AC 155 [1949] 1 All ER 60, LJR 238, TLR 9, 93 Sol. Jo, HL, a driver is not bound to foresee every extremity of folly which occurs on the road. Equally he is certainly not entitled to dr......
-
Jennifer Prescott Claimant v Aldrick Parris John Primus Defendants [ECSC]
...Slade J. said: "Paraphrasing the words of Lord Uthwatt inLondon Passenger Transport Board v. Upson [1949] AC 155 [1949] 1 All ER 60, LJR 238, TLR 9, 93 Sol. Jo, HL, a driver is not bound to foresee every extremity of folly which occurs on the road. Equally he is certainly not entitled to dr......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Contract made in two places at once - a possibility under UK law
...the High Court in this instance applied the reasoning of Mann J in the High Court case of Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [2004] EWHC 768 (Ch). Whilst Mann J's comments on this point were obiter, Mann J expressed the view in the Apple case that it is possible, as a matter of principle,......
-
UK High Court Revisits Issue of Where a Contract Is Formed
...means that the contract is usually made where acceptance of the offer is received. However, in Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc, [2004] EWHC 768 (Ch), the court commented that it is possible, as a matter of principle, for a contract to be made in two places at once. In Apple, the partie......
1 books & journal articles
-
Escape From Uncertainty: Article 4(3) Rome I Regulation
...& Contractors SAE v Land Rover Exports Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 2019, [2002] CLC 533, [47]. 101 Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [2004] EWHC 768 (Ch), [2004] 2 CLC 720 [62]. 15 S.S.L.R Escape From Uncertainty: Article 4(3) Rome I Regulation Vol.7 the Convention will also be relevant in relat......