Arcadis UK Ltd v May and Baker Ltd (t/a Sanofi)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeThe Hon Mr Justice Coulson
Judgment Date27 February 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] EWHC 376 (TCC),[2013] EWHC 87 (TCC)
Docket NumberCase No: HT-12-402
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
Date27 February 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Clegg Food Projects Ltd v Prestige Car Direct Properties Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 19 August 2025
    ...1569 (TCC); (o) Harris Calnan Construction Co. Ltd v Ridgewood (Kensington) Ltd [2007] EWHC 2738 (TCC); (p) Arcadis UK Ltd v May and Baker Ltd (t/a Sanofi) [2013] EWHC 87 (TCC); (q) ABB Ltd v BAM Nuttall Ltd [2013] EWHC 1983 (TCC); (r) Broughton Brickwork Ltd v F Parkinson Ltd [2014] EWHC 4......
4 firm's commentaries
  • Summary of principles from recent NEC cases
    • Hong Kong
    • JD Supra Hong Kong
    • 10 September 2018
    ...that may impact upon the construction industry. We hope that you will find it useful. Arcadis UK Ltd v May and Baker Ltd (t/a Sanofi) [2013] EWHC 87 (TCC) NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract Where two adjudications between the same parties were on very similar issues, the second adju......
  • Five Practice Points We Have Learnt About Adjudication In The Last Six Months
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 4 September 2013
    ...in one adjudication be placed before an adjudicator in a subsequent adjudication? Arcadis UK Ltd v May and Baker Ltd (t/a Sanofi) [2013] EWHC 87 (TCC) In certain circumstances, In the Arcadis case, Mr Justice Akenhead did not hesitate in finding that it was neither improper nor contrary to ......
  • Is A Previous Adjudicator's Decision Binding?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 3 July 2013
    ...UK Ltd v May and Baker Ltd [2013] EWHC 87 (TCC) Once again, a recent jurisdictional challenge case shows the Courts' reluctance to interfere with an adjudicator's The Facts May and Baker Ltd (trading as Sanofi-Aventis) engaged Arcadis UK Ltd to carry out works at its site in Dagenham, under......
  • In Site Spring 2013
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 30 April 2013
    ...as his residence”. The meaning of this “intention to occupy” requirement was examined in Westfields Construction Ltd v Clive Lewis [2013] EWHC 376 where the court clarified that the section 106 exemption was intended to protect ordinary householders, not otherwise concerned with property or......