Archer v Catton & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1954 |
| Court | Assizes |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Cartledge v E. Jopling & Sons Ltd
...arise of knowledge of what and whether a man ought to have known if in fact he did not know. 17In ( Archer v. Catton & Co. Ltd. 1954 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 896) the plaintiff's disease had arisen from his work between 1923 and 1940 and not after that date. He became aware of it in Octo......
-
Cartledge v E. Jopling & Sons Ltd
...v. George, 5 B. & C. 149, and Short v. M'Carthy, 1820 3 B. & A. 626, and Thomson v. Lord Clanmorris [1900] 1 Ch. 718. 44In Archer v. Catton & Co. Ltd. [1954] 1 All E.R. 896, a pneumoconiosis case, Streatfeild, J. rejected a contention that the cause of action did not accrue until the pla......
-
Brown v North British Steel Foundry Ltd
...p. 162. 8 Reference was also made to Brazier v. Ministry of DefenceUNK, [1965] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 26, and Archer v. Catton & Co. Ltd.WLR,[1954] 1 W. L. R. 775. 9 Cartledge v. E. Jopling & Sons Ltd.ELR, [1963] A. C. 758, Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest at p. 775; Davie v. Scottish Enamelling Co.SC, ......
-
Kruk v. Ho et al., 2008 BCCA 201
...interpretation for over 100 years: see Howell v. Young (1826), 5 B. & C. 259, 108 E.R. 97 (K.B.); Archer v. Catton & Co. , [1954] 1 W.L.R. 775, [1954] 1 All E.R. 896 (Q.B.); Cartledge v. E. Jopling & Sons Ltd. [1963] A.C. 758, [1963] 2 W.L.R. 210, [1963] 1 All E.R. 341 (H.L.); P......
Request a trial to view additional results