Arcos Ltd v E. A. Ronaasen & Son

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Date1933
Year1933

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Yngevar Hansen-Tangen (trading as H. E. Hansen-Tangen)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 March 1976
    ... ... He cited two cases in the House of Lords, Bowes v. Shand in 1877 2 A.C.45 , and Arcos v. Ronaasen in 1933 A.C.470 , and several other cases in lower Courts. He acknowledged that in order to have this effect, the error in description ... ...
  • Hill (Christopher) Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd (Description)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 February 1971
    ... ... Where goods are unascertained, "description" implies a specification whereby the goods can be identified by the buyer. Such a case was Arcos v. Ronaasen & Son [1933] A.C. 470 where the timber contracted for was precisely specified as to length, breadth and thickness. Neither f.a.q. nor ... ...
  • Spencer Day v Tiuta International Ltd, and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 September 2014
    ... ... 2011), para 17–062, citing Arcos Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Sons [1933] AC 470 ; iii) a party who has rescinded a contract on grounds that later prove to be unsustainable may ... ...
  • Stepping Stones Child Care Centre (ACT) Pty Ltd Acn 120 005 503 v Early Learning Services Ltd ACN 123 828 553
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 9 September 2013
    ...v Pacific Bay Development Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 190 Andoy Pty Ltd v S & M Cannon Pty Ltd (1990) 17 IPR 533 Arcos Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Son [1933] AC 470 Arthur Guiness, Sons & Co (Dublin) Ltd v The Freshfield (owners) [1965] P 294 Artifakts Design Group Ltd v N P Rigg Ltd [1993] 1 NZLR 196 Au......
  • Get Started for Free