Arden v Boyce

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1894
Date1894
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Gordon
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Friend v. Shaw (1887) 20 Q. B. D. 374 and Arden v. Boyce [1894] 1 Q. B. 796 distinguished ... CASE stated by justices ... At a court of summary jurisdiction sitting at Brierley Hill, ... ...
  • Bank of Ireland v Lady Lisa Ireland Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1993
    ...1926 O.3 RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 1905 O.3 r6 LANDLORD & TENANT LAW AMDT ACT IRL 1860 KEATING V MULCAHY 1926 IR 214 ARDEN V BOYCE 1894 1 QB 796 MEARES V CONNOLLY 1930 IR 333 NOLAN V CULLEN 1901 2 IR 628 FITZSIMONS V PARKER 1949 IJ 59 THOMPSON V O'NEILL 90 ILTR 73 SWEENEY V POWERSCOURT ......
  • Stokes v Tracey
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 11 May 1920
    ...accordingly, the plaintiff could not obtain leave to enter judgment for recovery of the land under Or. XIV., r. 1. Arden v. BoyceELR([1894] 1 Q. B. 796) and Gleeson v. KeownDLTR(32 I. L. T. R. 150) followed App., Stokes and Tracey Action for recovery of land - Or. XIV., r. 1 - Specially ind......
  • Hassan bin Din and Others; Khong Kim Ching
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1973
  • Get Started for Free