Armitage v Nurse

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE MILLETT,LORD JUSTICE HUTCHISON,LORD JUSTICE HIRST
Judgment Date19 March 1997
Neutral Citation[1997] EWCA Civ 1279
Docket NumberCHANF 95/1318/B
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date19 March 1997
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
398 cases
  • JSC Bank of Moscow (A company incorporated in Russia) v Vladimir Abramovich Kekhman and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 29 October 2015
    ...effect if the facts pleaded are consistent with conduct which is not dishonest such as negligence. As Millett LJ said in Armitage v Nurse [1998] Ch 241, 256G, it is not necessary to use the word "fraud" or "dishonesty" if the facts which make the conduct fraudulent are pleaded. But this wil......
  • Spread Trustee Company Ltd v Hutcheson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 15 June 2011
    ...were not so exonerated depended upon the true construction of the particular trust in question: see eg, in the English Court of Appeal, Armitage v Nurse [1998] Ch 241 per Millett LJ (with whom Hirst and Hutchison LJJ agreed) at 254E to 256A and, in the Jersey Court of Appeal, Midland ......
  • Madoff Securities International Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Stephen Raven and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 October 2013
    ...separate cause of action for dishonest breach. 324 The exception in s. 21(1)(a) only applies where the director's conduct is dishonest: Armitage v Nurse [1998] Ch 241, 260F-G. In this context, as Millett LJ explained at 251E-F, dishonesty: "connotes at the minimum an intention on the part o......
  • Fitzwood Pty Ltd v Unique Goalpty Ltd (in Liquidation)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 firm's commentaries
  • Limited Liability in Trust Context: A Black-Letter Synopsis
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 5 February 2023
    ...defining a confidential relationship). 6314 Scott & Ascher §24.27.4 (Exculpatory Provision Improperly Inserted). 632Armitage v. Nurse [1997] 2 All E.R. 705 (Eng.). 5 [however]… has started a consultation exercise on reforming this area of the law to bar such clauses from general use by prof......
  • Clayton v Clayton: nipping the Illusory Trust in the bud
    • New Zealand
    • Mondaq New Zealand
    • 9 September 2015
    ...Court of Appeal decision at [26(c)]. 7Clayton v Clayton [2013] NZHC 301, [2013] 3 NZLR 235 (the "High Court decision"). 8Armitage v Nurse [1998] Ch 241 (CA). 9The Court of Appeal decision at [31] and the High Court decision at [85]-[88]. 10[2012] NZHC 323. 11Ibid at [30]. 12The Court of App......
  • Recent Developments In The Law Relating To Trustee Exoneration Clauses
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 3 November 2011
    ...v Hogg (1861) 5 LT 467 5 Trustee Exemption Clauses (Law Com. No. 301), 2.1. 6 Thomas and Hudson, The Law of Trusts (2nd Ed.), 21.41. 7 [1997] EWCA Civ 1279 8 Usually now the instrument would include the words "or wilful default" at the 9 The same rule operates in the Bahamas, although it wa......
  • Trustee Exemption Clauses: Redundant Or Required? By Archie J. Rabinowitz, B.A., L.L.B.*
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • 19 November 2012
    ...to relyonan exemption clause which excluded liability unless there had been “a breach of trust knowingly 11. [1900] A.C. 271 (H.L.). 12. [1998] Ch. 241 (C.A.) [hereinafter Armitage]. 13. Ibid., at para. 14. 14. Ibid., at para. 24. 15. Article 26(9) is now found in Article 30(10) after the m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
28 books & journal articles
  • THE EFFECTIVE REACH OF CHOICE OF LAW AGREEMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...of this article. 87 In domestic law, contractual exclusion of liability for (actual) fraud is against public policy: Armitage v Nurse[1998] Ch 241 (CA). There is little doubt that this is fundamental public policy of the forum. 88 Unfair Contract Terms Act (Cap 396, 1994 Rev Ed). A choice o......
  • NAVIGATING THE MAZE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Securities and Investments Commission v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd (No 4)(2007) 160 FCR 35 at [280], per Jacobson J. 24[1998] Ch 241. 25Armitage v Nurse[1998] Ch 241 at 253–254; and endorsed by the High Court in Then Khek Koon v Arjun Permanand Samtani[2014] 1 SLR 245 at [10......
  • Can Complex Contracts Effectively Replace Bankruptcy Principles? Why Interpretation Matters.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 92 No. 4, September 2018
    • 22 September 2018
    ...INTERMEDIARIES [paragraph] 3.29, at 40; [paragraph] 3.37-3.40, at 43-45; Kelly v Cooper [1993] AC 205, at 214. (95) Armitage v. Nurse [1998] Ch 241. (96) Id. at 251 ("By consciously acting beyond their powers (as, for example, by making an investment which they know to be unauthorized) the ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Bay Estates Ltd v Canada, 2017 BCCA 374 .......................................... 142 295 THE LAW OF PROPERTY 296 Armitage v Nurse, [1997] EWCA Civ 1279, [1998] Ch 241 ................................. 77 Armory v Delamirie (1722), 1 Strange 505, 93 ER 664 .......................... 28, 29......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT