Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Date2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • South Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service v Mr D Mansell and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 30 January 2018
    ...neither side contended that it was wrongly decided.” (Paragraph 21) E Working Time Claims 32. F In Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou [2012] ICR 510, the complaint was in form of the present case, namely “working time detriment” under section 45A. The issue on the appeal concerned causation......
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal, 2015-06-12, (Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust v M Wyeth)
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 12 June 2015
    ...why” question, which is not the same as a “but for” test, see as put by HHJ Peter Clark in the case of Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou [2012] ICR 510: “28. The reason why question must not be confused with the “but for” test. … In whereas the but for test may be appropriate in “criterion......
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal, 2015-04-10, (Mr S Gale and Others v Mid and West Wales Fire Service)
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 10 April 2015
    ...been done “on grounds of” one of the prohibited reasons. It reminded itself of the EAT’s decision in Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou [2012] ICR 510, laying down an approach akin to protected detriment and discrimination victimisation cases. It further noted that the burden of proof was a......
  • Wyeth v Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT