Artizans, Labourers and General Dwellings Company v Whitaker

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1919
Date1919
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Johnson v Moreton
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 July 1978
    ...The Rent Restrictions Acts are an example. We were referred to the momentous decision of Astbury J, under the Act of 1915, in Artizans Dwellings Co. v. Whitaker [1919] 2 K.B. 301, at 304, subsequently embodied by Parliament in the Act of 1920. The reasoning of Astbury J's. judgment was acce......
  • Burnham v Carroll Musgrove Theatres Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Laimond Properties Ltd v Rowida Al-Shakarchi
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 February 1998
    ...Act, 1977 and the Housing Act, 1988?" 17 It is not possible to contract out of the Rent Acts, see Artizans Dwellings Company v Whitaker [1919] 2KB 301 and AG Securities v Vaughan and others and Antoniades and Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. At page 458D Lord Templeman said: "Parties to an agreeme......
  • Gatien Motor Company Ltd v Continental Oil Company of Ireland Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 6 April 1979
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • PAN ASIAN AFRICAN CO. LTD. V. NICON
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1982 Cases reported in 1982
    • 22 November 2022
    ...Harland 1 Sc.N.R. 497. 44. Cornish v. Searell (1828) 8 B. & C. 471. 45.Artisans, Labourers and General Dwellings Co. Ltd. v. Whitaker (1919) 2 K.B. 301. 30 46. Thunder D. Weaver v. Belcher (1803) 3 East 449. 47.De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd. v. Howe (1906) A.C. 455, 459. Mr. H.A. Lardner ......