Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold

CourtCourt of Appeal
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
76 cases
  • Ferrishurst Ltd v Wallcite Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 30 November 1998
    ...the reversion. However in this appeal Ferrishurst has been facing a formidable obstacle, that is the decision of this court in Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1989] Ch 1. Mr Alexander Hill-Smith, appearing for Ferrishurst, did not shrink from the submission that, if not distinguishable, it ought ......
  • United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 2 February 1996
    ...Ives Investments Ltd v. High [1967] 2 QB 379; Re Vandervell's Trusts (No.2) [1974] Ch 269, Hodgson v. Marks [1971] Ch 892, and Ashburn Anstalt v. Arnold [1989] Ch 1. I intend no discourtesy to Mr Pymont when I say that none of these authorities seems to me to come anywhere near establishing......
  • Anne George Claimant v Bernard Louis Daisley Cibc Caribbean Ltd Defendants [ECSC]
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 4 February 2002
    ...Williams and Glyn's Bank Ltd v Bolan and another , Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Brown [1980] 2 All ER 408 Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147 Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset and another [1988] 3 All ER 915 Baunsley's Conveyancing Law and Practice, 4th Edition, 1998, pages 560-565. R......
  • Cheng Hang Guan v Perumahan Farlim (Penang) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
  • Overriding Interests: Occupation of Part of the Land
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 63-1, January 2000
    • 1 January 2000
    ...nor an interest protected by an entry on the register, cannevertheless be binding upon a transferee for value of a registered estate.185 [1989] Ch 1.6 [1989] Ch 1, 28 per Fox LJ (delivering the judgment of the court).7 The aspect of the Asburn Anstalt case raised in Ferrishurt Ltd vWallhurs......
  • Undue Influence in the House of Lords: Principles and Proof
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 65-3, May 2002
    • 1 May 2002
    ...9 OJLS 285 and P. D. Finn, ‘The Fiduciary Principle’, in T.G. Youdan (ed), Equity,Fiduciaries and Trusts (Toronto: Carswell, 1989) ch 1.35 According to Flannigan, the difference between wider fiduciary breach and relational undue influencelies merely in the particular mechanism of the abuse......
  • A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices)
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Law and Society Nbr. 28-4, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...‘Governed by Law?’ (1998) 7 Social and Legal Studies541–53.18 id., p. 545, my emphasis; see, also, C. Smart, Feminism and the Power of Law(1989) ch. 1; N. Rose, ‘Expertise and the Government of Conduct’ (1994) 14 Studiesin Law, Politics and Society 359–97.ßBlackwell Publishers Ltd In taking......
  • Developing national civil commitment laws for the mentally ill.
    • Australia
    • University of Western Sydney Law Review Nbr. 16, January 2012
    • 1 January 2012
    ...on Civil Commitment, (Ashgate, 2003) xxxiii; Michael L Perlin, Mental Disability Law: Civil and Criminal (Lexis Law Publication, 2nd ed, 1989) Ch 1; David Wexler and Bruce Winick, Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence (Carolina Academic Press, (97) Paul S Appel......
  • Request a trial to view additional results