Ashburton (Lord) v Pape
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1913 |
| Year | 1913 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
112 cases
-
McK (F) v L (O)
...ACT 2000 S27(1) COMMISSION TO INQUIRE INTO CHILD ABUSE ACT 2000 S27(2) MCGREAL v DPP UNREP HANNA 14.7.2008 (EX TEMPORE) ASHBURTON v PAPE 1913 2 CH 469 WAGSTAFF v WAGSTAFF 1992 1 WLR 320 1992 1 AER 275 1992 1 FLR 333 1992 1 FCR 305 1992 PIQR P308 C v C (FINANCIAL PROVISION: PERSONAL DAMAGES)......
-
Butler v Board of Trade
... ... 302 ; [ 1965 ] 2 W.L.R. 790 ; [ 1965 ] 1 All E.R. 611 ... Ashburton (Lord) v. Pape [ 1913 ] 2 Ch. 469 , C.A ... Bullivant v. Attorney-General for Victoria ... ...
-
Goddard v Nationwide Building Society
...or copy document as evidence in litigation between himself and the erstwhile client. See Calcraft v. Guest [1898] 1 QB 759. 11 In Ashburton v. Pape the latter was a bankrupt, whose discharge was opposed by amongst others, the plaintiff. One Nocton had been Ashburton's solicitor and he emplo......
-
Duchess of Argyll v Duke of Argyll
...the second and third defendants in respect of publication of the marital confidences (post, p. 333C). Ashburton v. Pape [1913] 2 Ch. 469; 29 T.L.R. 623, C.A. (6) That publication of evidence, other than that referred to by the judge in his judgment, given in the divorce proceedings was made......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The High Court, Privilege And Paradise: The ATO And Accessing Corporate Confidential Information
...confine the scope of LPP when it referred to it as 'an important common law immunity' That the English decision of Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469, which has been followed in Australia, would leave a significant gap in the law if it was understood to have held that an injunction will ......
6 books & journal articles
-
Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
...at 441; Rattray vRattray(1897) 25 R 315 at 318; Calcraft vGuest [1898] 1 QB 759; Crook vDuncan (1899) 1 F (J) 50 at 52; Ashburton vPape [1913]2 Ch 469 at 473; Hodgson vMacpherson (1913) 7 Adam 118 at 125. Cf, Bell vBlack and Morrison (1865) 5 Irv 57 at 65;Jackson vStevenson (1897) 2 Adam 25......
-
The Wrong Tort in the Right Place: Avenues for the Development of Civil Privacy Protections in New Zealand
...26 LJ Ch 113. 112 Lenah Game Meats, above n 40. 113 Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EngR 255 (1849) 1 H & Tw 1; Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469; Argyll , above n 44. The Wrong Tort in the Right Place 319 breach of confidence action is relevant to the future development of the New Zeala......
-
Some aspects of waiver of litigation privilege in commonwealth jurisdictions
...his or the other's legal 33 Goddard v.NationwideBuilding Society [1987] QB 670: [l986] 3AllER 264 34 Ibid. 35 Ashburton (Lord) v. Pope [1913] 2 Ch 469; Corporate Group Holdings Ltd v. Corporate Resources Group Ltd [1991] 1 NZLR 115; Guinness Peat Properties Ltdv.FitzroyRobinson Partnership ......
-
The Duty of Confidence Revisited: The protection of confidential information
...Keith explains that ‘[i]t is a general rule of law that a third party who comes into possession of confidential 7Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469, 475 (Swinfen Eady LJ); Commonwealth v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1980) 147 CLR 39, 50 (Mason J); Franklin v Giddins [1978] Qd R 72; Sullivan ......
Get Started for Free