Ashburton (Lord) v Pape

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1913
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
110 cases
  • Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 Abril 1987
    ...so far as it goes, would seem to me unanswerable. However, it appears that he was not also reminded of the decision of this court in Lord Ashburton v. Pape [1913] 2 CH. 469. In that case Pape was a bankrupt, whose discharge was opposed by the plaintiff. Pape served on a clerk of the plainti......
  • Goddard v Nationwide Building Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 Junio 1986
    ...from making any use of the communication or the original or copy documents and can be ordered to return them to the client. See Ashburton v. Pape [1913] 2 Ch.469. 10 For the respondent it was contended that even though communications between solicitor and client are confidential, neverthele......
  • Ashcroft v Mersey Regional Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 30 Mayo 2003
    ...(3) Anderson v. Bank of British ColumbiaELR(1876), 2 Ch. D. 644, dicta of Jessel, M.R. considered. (4) Ashburton (Lord) v. PapeELR, [1913] 2 Ch. 469; [1911–13] All E.R. Rep. 708; sub nom. Ashburton v. NoctonUNK(1913), 29 T.L.R. 623, dicta of Cozens-Hardy, M.R., Kennedy and Swinfen Eady, L.J......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-1-2, January 2017
    • 1 Enero 2017
    ...at 441; Rattray vRattray(1897) 25 R 315 at 318; Calcraft vGuest [1898] 1 QB 759; Crook vDuncan (1899) 1 F (J) 50 at 52; Ashburton vPape [1913]2 Ch 469 at 473; Hodgson vMacpherson (1913) 7 Adam 118 at 125. Cf, Bell vBlack and Morrison (1865) 5 Irv 57 at 65;Jackson vStevenson (1897) 2 Adam 25......
  • The Wrong Tort in the Right Place: Avenues for the Development of Civil Privacy Protections in New Zealand
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 22-2016, January 2016
    • 1 Enero 2016
    ...26 LJ Ch 113. 112 Lenah Game Meats, above n 40. 113 Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EngR 255 (1849) 1 H & Tw 1; Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469; Argyll , above n 44. The Wrong Tort in the Right Place 319 breach of confidence action is relevant to the future development of the New Zeala......
  • The Duty of Confidence Revisited: The protection of confidential information
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 39-2, September 2015
    • 1 Septiembre 2015
    ...Keith explains that ‘[i]t is a general rule of law that a third party who comes into possession of confidential 7Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469, 475 (Swinfen Eady LJ); Commonwealth v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1980) 147 CLR 39, 50 (Mason J); Franklin v Giddins [1978] Qd R 72; Sullivan ......
  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats: privacy, injunctions and possums: an analysis of the high court's decision.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 Diciembre 2002
    ...Law Review 418, 440-5. See further Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373, [70] (Lord Phillips MR). (54) See, eg, Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469, 475 (Swinfen Eady (55) The example is taken from A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, 281 (Lord Goff). See also Hellewel......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT