Assets Company v Mere Roihi ; Assets Company v Wiremu Pere ; Assets Company v Panapa Waihopi ; Assets Company v Wi Pere ; Assets Company v Teira Ranginui ; Assets Company v Heni Tipuna
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1905 |
| Year | 1905 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
303 cases
-
Jones v Registrar of Lands
...the intervenor. Cases cited: (1) -Assaf v. Fuwa, [1955] A.C. 215; (1954), 98 Sol. Jo. 733, followed. (2) -Assets Co. Ltd. v. Mere Roihi, [1905] A.C. 176, distinguished. (3) -Cave v. CaveELR (1880), 15 Ch. D. 639; sub nom. Chaplin v. Cave, Cave v. Cave, 49 L.J. Ch. 505, followed. (4) -Diploc......
-
Daley (Rudolph) v RBTT Bank Jamaica Ltd Etal Walters v Rudolph Daley, RBYY Bank Jamaica Ltd, Harley Corporation Guarantee Trust Company Ltd Harley Corporation Guarantee Trust Company Ltd v Etal Walters; Etal Walters v Rudolph Walters and RBYY Bank Jamaica Ltd [Consolidated Suits]
...the person, and said to be as good as actual knowledge. The decisions beginning with Lord Lindley in Asset Company Limited v Mere Roihi [1905] A.C. 176 incorporate the principle of wilful blindness or contrived ignorance. Salmond J. of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand spelt this out quit......
- Pekan Nenas Industries Sdn Bhd v Chang Ching Chuen and Others
-
Bent (Linel) v Eleanor Evans et Al
...has been authoritatively laid down for our guidance by the Privy Council in the New Zealand case of Assets Company Limited v Mere Roihi (1905) A.C. 176. Lord Lindley, in delivering the opinion of the Board, clearly stated at page 210 the nature of the fraud required to defeat a registered ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
When can fraud on a mortgage be brought home to the bank?
...fraud. The bank’s application for dismissal The bank referred to the accepted definition of fraud from Assets Company Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] AC 176 where the Privy Council [at 210] stated “the fraud which must be provided in order to invalidate the title of a registered purchaser for value......
-
When Can Fraud On A Mortgage Be Brought Home To The Bank?
...fraud. The bank's application for dismissal The bank referred to the accepted definition of fraud from Assets Company Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] AC 176 where the Privy Council [at 210] stated "the fraud which must be provided in order to invalidate the title of a registered purchaser for value......
10 books & journal articles
-
Land Law
...of the document. Both Waimiha Sawmilling Co Ltd v Waione Timber Co Ltd[1923] NZLR 1137 at 1175 and Assets Company, Limited v Mere Roihi[1905] AC 176 at 210 have made it clear that fraud under the Torrens system is not limited to cases of actual and certain knowledge. On this issue, Lai J co......
-
The End of Knowing Receipt
...Pty Ltd v Barnes , [1971] SASR 100 at 103 (SC (Austl)). 57. See Millet, “Tracing”, supra note 40. 58. Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi , [1905] AC 176 (PC (NZ)) at 210; See also Arthur , supra note 3 at para 40. 59. [2007] HCA 22. 17 (2016) 2(1) CJCCL “the other parties are in no worse position”.......
-
Barnes v Addy claims and the indefeasibility of Torrens title.
...Logic or Legend?' in David Grinlinton (ed), Torrens in the Twenty-First Century (2003) 3, 6. (31) Assets Co Lid v Mere Roihi [1905] AC 176; Boyd v Mayor of Wellington [1924] NZLR 1174; Frazerv Walker [1967] 1 AC 569; Breskvar v Wall (1971) 126 CLR 376. In Chasfild Pty Ltdv Taranto [1991] 1 ......
-
Land Law
...to the authorities, is equivalent to actual knowledge, and therefore amounts to fraud. 18.3 In Assets Company, Limited v Mere Roihi[1905] AC 176 at 210, Lord Lindley, in delivering the decision of the Privy Council in an appeal from New Zealand, explained thus: [T]he fraud which must be pro......
Request a trial to view additional results