Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 1947 |
| Date | 1947 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3928 cases
-
Eircom Ltd v Commission for Communications Regulation
...NETWORKS & SERVICES) (ACCESS) REGS 2003 SI 305/2003 ART 6(1) ASSOCIATED PROVINCIAL PICTURE HOUSES LTD v WEDNESBURY CORPORATION 1948 1 KB 223 KEEGAN, STATE v STARDUST VICTIMS COMPENSATION TRIBUNAL 1986 IR 642 KIBERD & CAREY v HAMILTON 1992 2 IR 257 1992 ILRM 574 O'KEEFFE v BORD PL......
-
Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
...v Merton London BC [1978] AC 728, [1977] 2 All ER 492, [1977] 2 WLR 1024, HL. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948] 1 KB 223, [1947] 2 All ER 680, CA. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118, [1957] 1 WLR 582. Caparo Industries plc v Dick......
-
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
...532, paras 26-28, Lord Steyn pointed out that neither the traditional approach to judicial review formulated in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 nor the heightened scrutiny approach adopted in R v Ministry of Defence, Ex p Smith [1996] QB 5......
- Canwest Global Communications Corporation and Others v Australian Broadcasting Authority and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
19 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Just Another Stop On The Road For QASA
...submitted that instead of the Wednesbury standard of review (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] 2 All ER 680), the Divisional Court should have applied the more demanding standard of proportionality, because of QASA's potential to infringe upon fundamen......
-
Implied terms in contracts of employment Good Faith, Reasonableness
...respect the "public law" principle established by Associated Provincial Pictures Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 – namely that no conclusion can stand when it is "so unreasonable that no reasonable decision maker would ever have come to it". His Honou......
-
Award for future economic loss where no loss is presently suffered
...240; Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 3 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223 Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July The content of this article is intended to p......
-
The UK’s Expanded Senior Managers and Certification Regime: Key Issues and Action Plan for Brokers, Advisers and Asset Managers
...the FCA may have regard to the principle established in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation ((1948) 1KB 223), which establishes that a decision will be reasonable provided that it is not so unreasonable that no reasonable person acting reasonably could have com......
Request a trial to view additional results
42 books & journal articles
-
Judicial Review of Migration Decisions: Life after S157
...[2004] FCAFC 286, [18] 88 After the judgment of Lord Greene MR in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223, 229–30. 89 S20 (2003) 198 ALR 59, 76 [73]–[74] (McHugh and Gummow JJ), 90 [142] (Kirby J). Gleeson CJ and Callinan J did not address this ques......
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs V Yusuf:1 One Door Closed, Another Opened?
...amounts to an excess of jurisdiction.')141 (1999) 197 CLR 611.142 See Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223. Theterm is used to decide a decision that is so unreasonable that no reasonable decision-makercould have reached it.143 Eshetu (1999) 197 ......
-
Objective justification, less discriminatory alternatives, and the ‘Great Repeal Bill’
...House of Lords (4-1) reversed the Court ofAppeal on this point.102. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223(CA).212 International Journal of Discrimination and the Law...
-
Any Excuse for Certainty: English Perspectives on the Defence of ‘Reasonable Excuse’
...Section 5 of the Public Order Act’ [2004] PL 853. 59 Ibid. at 866.60 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] 2 All ER 680, CA codified the principle that where a decision is so out of the realms of normaldecision-making that no reasonable authority could hav......
Request a trial to view additional results