Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1947 |
| Date | 1947 |
| Year | 1947 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4689 cases
-
Eircom Ltd v Commission for Communications Regulation
...NETWORKS & SERVICES) (ACCESS) REGS 2003 SI 305/2003 ART 6(1) ASSOCIATED PROVINCIAL PICTURE HOUSES LTD v WEDNESBURY CORPORATION 1948 1 KB 223 KEEGAN, STATE v STARDUST VICTIMS COMPENSATION TRIBUNAL 1986 IR 642 KIBERD & CAREY v HAMILTON 1992 2 IR 257 1992 ILRM 574 O'KEEFFE v BORD PLEANALA ......
-
M and Another v London Borough of Newham and Others; X and Others v Bedfordshire County Council
...a decision into the question of liability at common law for negligence. In public law a decision can be ultra vires for reasons other than Wednesbury unreasonableness ( Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223) (e.g. breach of the rules of natur......
-
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
...532, paras 26-28, Lord Steyn pointed out that neither the traditional approach to judicial review formulated in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 nor the heightened scrutiny approach adopted in R v Ministry of Defence, Ex p Smith [1996] QB 5......
-
M and Another v London Borough of Newham and Others; X and Others v Bedfordshire County Council
...a decision into the question of liability at common law for negligence. In public law a decision can be ultra vires for reasons other than Wednesbury unreasonableness ( Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223) (e.g. breach of the rules of natur......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 firm's commentaries
-
Implied terms in contracts of employment Good Faith, Reasonableness
...had to "at least" respect the "public law" principle established by Associated Provincial Pictures Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 – namely that no conclusion can stand when it is "so unreasonable that no reasonable decision maker would ever have come to it". His Honour'......
-
Court Of Appeal Just Another Stop On The Road For QASA
...submitted that instead of the Wednesbury standard of review (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] 2 All ER 680), the Divisional Court should have applied the more demanding standard of proportionality, because of QASA's potential to infringe upon fundamen......
-
Award for future economic loss where no loss is presently suffered
...240; Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 3 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223 Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July The content of this article is intended to p......
-
Letters Of Wishes: Adequate Deliberations
...I.C.R. 991, 999; Wild v Pensions Ombudsman [1996] O.P.L.R. 129, 135. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223. Chadwick LJ quoted [(n 10) 628-30] at length from the judgment of Lord Greene MR at See (n 11) 628. [2012] ch 132 at 164-65 (per Lloyd L......
Request a trial to view additional results
109 books & journal articles
-
Misfeasance in public office: a very peculiar tort.
...J). (163) Chancery Amendment Act 1858, 21 & 22 Vict, c 27, s 2. (164) See Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948] 1 KB 223, 229-30 (Lord Greene MR); Mark Aronson, Bruce Dyer and Matthew Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Lawbook, 4th ed, 2009) 36......
-
Government liability in negligence.
...158. (18) Ibid 157. (19) Ibid 158. (20) Ibid (recommendation 39). (21) Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 (22) Ipp Report, above n 8, 157-9. (23) [1996] AC 923. In fact, Stovin had suggested gross carelessness as a reason for imposing liability......
-
'Anxious Scrutiny' in the Irish Courts: Too Little, Too Late?
...any remaining defects of style or content are entirely my own. 1 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223. 2 See generally Sir John Laws, “Wednesbury” in Forsyth and Hare (eds), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) ......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...including that such policy not be considered unreasonable in the Wednesbury (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp[1948] 1 KB 223) sense: City Developments Ltd v Chief Assessor[2008] 4 SLR 150 (‘City Developments’) at [10]. In assessing this particular meaning of reason......
Request a trial to view additional results