Attorney General for Australia v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1957 |
| Year | 1957 |
| Date | 1957 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
59 cases
-
Dennis Hotels Proprietary Ltd v State of Victoria
... ... ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS INTERVENERS ... 1961 June 14 ... By section 74: ... “No appeal shall be permitted to the Queen in Council from a decision of the High Court upon any question, howsoever ... ...
- Bata Shoe Company Guyana Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General and; Guyana Unit Trust Management Company Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
- Semenyih Jaya Sdn Bhd v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
- Indira Gandhi a/p Mutho v Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Perak and Others and other appeals
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...125 CLR 591, 600; the expression was originally used in Attorney-General (Cth) v The Queen ('Boilermakers' Case') (1957) 95 CLR 529, 545; [1957] AC 288, 320 (Viscount Simonds, for the Judicial Committee). 2005 Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction 79 ____________________________________......
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...94 CLR 254, 290 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Fullagar, Kitto JJ); GPAO (1999) 196 CLR 553, 621–3 (McHugh and Callinan JJ); A-G (Cth) v The Queen [1957] AC 288, 320; Gould v Brown (1998) 193 CLR 346, 427 (McHugh J); cf Ruhani (2005) 219 ALR 199 [4] (Gleeson CJ). 148 See, eg, Capital Duplicators Pty......
-
The Limits and Use of Executive Power by Government
...Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254, 275 ('Boilermakers'). 109 Attorney-General (Australia) v The Queen [1957] AC 288, 315. 110 See, especially, ss 53, 57, 63 and 64. 434 Federal Law Review Volume 31 __________________________________________________________......
-
Extra-Constitutional Notions in Australian Constitutional Law
...(1977) 139CLR54, 87-88.10BuckvBavone (1976)135CLR110, 137; Miller vTCNChannel NinePtyLtd(1986)67ALR321, 337.11egA-GforAustralia vR[1957]AC288,311(PC) (the Boilermakers case); GWinterton,Parliament, the Executive and the Governor-General (1983) 56-57 (separationofpowers).12Griswold vConnecti......
Get Started for Free
