Attorney General for Ontario v Attorney General for the Dominion

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1896
Date1896
Year1896
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
93 cases
  • Calgary (City) v Bell Canada Inc., 2020 ABCA 211
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 21 May 2020
    ...1965) reprinted in W. Lederman, Continuing Canadian Constitutional Dilemmas 271-72 (1981) (emphasis in original). See Ontario v. Canada, [1896] A.C. 348, 360-61 (P.C.) (Can.) (“the exercise of legislative power by the Parliament of Canada, in regard to all matters not enumerated in s. 91, o......
  • RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général), (1995) 187 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • 21 September 1995
    ...[1988] 1 S.C.R. 401; 84 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 112]. Ontario (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General)(Local Prohibition Case), [1896] A.C. 348 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 112]. Local Prohibition Case - see Ontario (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General)(Local Prohibition Case). ......
  • Reference Re Firearms Act (Can.), 1998 ABCA 305
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 5 November 1997
    ...and Alberta, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 284; 49 N.R. 286, refd to. [para. 240]. Ontario (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General), [1896] A.C. 348 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. of Canada v. R., [1956] S.C.R. 303, refd to. [paras. 245, 400, 573]. Canada (Attorney General) v......
  • Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 22 December 2010
    ...Ltd., [1963] S.C.R. 570; Smith v. The Queen, [1960] S.C.R. 776; Attorney‑General for Ontario v. Attorney‑General for the Dominion, [1896] A.C. 348; Attorney‑General of Ontario v. Attorney‑General for the Dominion of Canada, [1894] A.C. 189; Hodge v. The Queen (1883), 9 App. Cas. 117; Papp v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • BLANEY’S APPEALS: ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JUNE 24 – 28, 2019)
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 29 June 2019
    ...ss. 22 and 23, 2005 SCC 56, R. v. Hydro-Québec, [1997] 3 SCR 213, Attorney-General for Ontario v. Attorney-General for the Dominion, [1896] A.C. 348, Attorney-General for Ontario v. Canada Temperance Federation, [1946] AC 193 (P.C.), Munro v. National Capital Commission, [1966] SCR 663, R. ......
  • Three Courts Of Appeal Weigh In On The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act Reference
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 May 2020
    ...Constitutional Law of Canada (Scarborough: Carswell, 2007) at 15.5 [Hogg]. 3. Ontario (Attorney General) v Canada (Attorney General), [1896] AC 348 at para 13; R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd, [1988] 1 SCR 401 at para 33 4. Zellerbach, supra note 3 at para 33. 5. Zellerbach, supra note 3 at......
20 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...Master and Fellows of Magdalen College in Cambridge (1615) 77 ER 1235, 1240(‘Magdalen College Case’).232. A-G (Ontario) v A-G (Dominion) (1896) AC 348, 361 (Lord Watson).233. Melbourne Harbour Trust Commissioners v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd (1925) 36 CLR 230, 279.234. R v Inhabitants o......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition Conclusion
    • 3 August 2017
    ...591, 19 B.C.L.R. (2d) 273, 38 C.C.C. (3d) 233 .................................................... 373 Ontario (A.G.) v. Canada (A.G.), [1896] A.C. 348, 5 Cart. B.N.A. 295 (P.C.) ................................................................270−51, 287 Ontario (A.G.) v. Canada (A.G.), [19......
  • Notes
    • Canada
    • Understanding Canada Federalism in Canada. Evolving Constitutional, Political, and Social Realities
    • 22 August 2023
    ...1867 , 30 & 31 Vict, c 3 (UK), s 91. 12 Russell v he Queen (1882), 7 App Cas 829, I Olmsted 145 (PC) [ Russell ]. 13 SC 1878, c 16. 14 [1896] AC 348, I Olmsted 343 (PC), known as the Local Prohibition Case 1896 . 15 For an in-depth examination of local prohibition and temperance, see K Broc......
  • The demise and rise of the classical paradigm in Canadian federalism: promoting autonomy for the provinces and First Nations.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 46 No. 2, April 2001
    • 1 April 2001
    ...constitution, see Hodge v. R., (1883) 9 App. Cas. 117 at 132 (P.C.) [hereinafter Hodge]; A.-G. Can. v. A.-G. Ont. (Local Prohibition), [1896] A.C. 348, 5 Cart. 295 (P.C.) [hereinafter Local Prohibition cited to A.C.]; Liquidators of the Maritime Bank v. Receiver General of New Brunswick, [1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT