Attorney General of Hong Kong v Wai-bun
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 29 March 1993 |
| Date | 29 March 1993 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
37 cases
- DPP v Jaikaran Tokai
-
O'C v DPP
...SHEEHAN V AMOND 1982 IR 235 SHERRY V WINE 1985 ILRM 196 AG'S REFERENCE (NO 1 OF 1990), IN RE 1992 3 AER 169 AG OF HONG KONG V CHEUNG 1994 1 AC 1 F V DPP UNREP CCA 2.12.1996 (NOT AVAILABLE) CRIMINAL LAW (RAPE) (AMDT) ACT 1990 S7 CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1992 S27 16th day of July 2000byKeane ......
-
Beanby Estates Ltd v Egg Stores (Stamford Hill) Ltd
...decisions, as in Colchester, but, unlike that case, they are mutually consistent. 44 A similar point was considered in DPP v C (an infant) [1994] AC 1 at 12F-13B, where the Divisional Court stated that it had power to depart from its own previous decision but that it would follow that decis......
-
Yugraneft v Abramovich
...if necessary, which they still retain) can properly be regarded as representing his property.” 373 Mr Swainston relied on A.G. for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] AC 1 as showing that there may be a duty to account for property to someone who was not the original owner of the property. In that case......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
The trend to ‘universal extradition’ over subsidiary universal jurisdiction in the suppression of transnational crime
...abduction from Mexico by United States agents. See S v Ebrahim 1991 (2) SA 553 (A),R v Horseferry Road Magistrates, ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 1 for contrary views.74See Gilbert (n 27) 99.75For example, this exception has been invoked to bar requests made by the UnitedKingdom to the Unite......
-
Fi We Law: The Emergence of Caribbean Jurisprudence and the Doctrine of Precedent
...courts unless overruled by the CCJ. Several other aspects of precedent were not 99. [2006] CCJ 3 (AJ), (2006) 69 WIR 104 (Bdos). 100. [1994] AC 1 (PC Ja). 101. [2001] 2 AC 50 (PC Ja). 102. Joseph (n 99) 18. 28 Fi We Law addressed by the Court that sees its institution as fostering Caribbean......