Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1992)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE,MR JUSTICE SCHIEMANN,or,and,AND |
| Judgment Date | 12 November 1993 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1993] EWCA Crim J1112-31 |
| Docket Number | No. 92/4466/S1 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 12 November 1993 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Chua Kian Kok v Public Prosecutor
...28.This decision was subsequently followed by a differently constituted Court of Appeal in Attorney General`s Reference (No 3 of 1992) [1994] 2 All ER 121. In that case, the accused were charged with attempted aggravated arson. The completed offence under s 1(2) of the Criminal Damage Act 1......
-
Tagiao AH-CHONG v R
...to damage property and being reckless as to whether the life of another would thereby be 68 Attorney-General’s Reference (No 3 of 1992) [1994] 1 WLR 409 The Court held that the defendant would be guilty in those circumstances, saying:70 If, on a charge of attempting to commit [an] offence, ......
-
Chua Kian Kok v Public Prosecutor
...28.This decision was subsequently followed by a differently constituted Court of Appeal in Attorney General`s Reference (No 3 of 1992) [1994] 2 All ER 121. In that case, the accused were charged with attempted aggravated arson. The completed offence under s 1(2) of the Criminal Damage Act 1......
-
To Shu Fai v Securities & Futures Commission
...adopt the reasoning of the English Court of Appeal in R v Khan (1990) 91 Cr App R 29; and Attorney-General’s Reference (No 3 of 1992) (1994) 98 Cr App R 383. 35. R v Khan was a case where the ingredients of the offence of attempted rape had to be addressed. Under s.1(1) of the Sexual Offenc......
2 books & journal articles
-
The Pitfalls in the Law of Attempt: A New Perspective
...provide: 36 For recent English authority which appears consonant with this analysis, see Attorney-General’s Reference (No. 3 of 1992) [1994] 2 All ER 121. 37 Gillies, above n. 34 at 81.38 Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495 at 501; R v Mohan [1976] QB 1 at 8.39 Gillies, above n. 34 at The Pitfall......
-
Conspiracy: Mens Rea
...Similarlyfor aggravated criminal damage where objective recklessness sufficed inAttorney-General’s Reference (No. 3 of 1992) [1994] 2 All ER 121, for theattempt, it is insufficient for conspiracy where defendants are merelyobjectively reckless as to an obvious and serious risk to life. The ......