Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 2004); R v Quayle; R v Wales; R v Taylor; R v Kenny
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judgment Date | 27 May 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWCA Crim 1415 |
| Date | 27 May 2005 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Caryn Moss v The Director of Public Prosecutions; The Director of Public Prosecutions v Caryn Moss
...v Lynch [1975] AC 653 mentioned DPP v Shannon [1975] AC 717 mentioned Howe v R [1987] 1 All ER 771 considered Regina v Quayle et al [2005] 1 WLR 3642 considered Regina v Z [2005] 2 AC 467 considered Russell et al v Regina [1989–90] 1 LRB 462 mentioned R v Ali [1995] Crim LR 303 mentioned ......
-
R v Altham
...view Article 3 adds nothing to the extensive arguments that were dealt with by Mance LJ in Quayle. Conclusion 30 Article 3R v Quayle and others [2005] EWCA Crim 1415. He has therefore advanced this appeal on the basis of Article 3 alone. 10 Article 3 provides: "No one shall be subjected to ......
-
R v CS
...was not available. After review of the authorities to which he had been referred, including the decision of this Court in R v Quayle [2005] 1 WLR 3642 (to which we refer at paragraph 11 below) he held: i) The prospect of sexual abuse was far from being imminent or immediate. The local autho......
-
R v S Ltd and L Ltd
... ... Mr Justice Griffith Williams ... No: 200900007-D5 200806863-D5 na and (1) S (2) L ... Mr A Mitchell QC appeared ... A paradigm is the case of Quayle [2005] 2 Crim App R 34 , in which the Court of ... ...
Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
-
Necessity as a Defence to Murder: An Anglo-Canadian Perspective
...‘immediate threat’ (on thebasis that it was too restrictive a requirement) in the common law duress79 Above n. 78 at [21].80 RvQuayle [2005] EWCA Crim 1415.81 See above RvHasan [2005] UKHL 22 at [27] and RvMartin [1989] 1 All ER 652,(1989) Cr App R 343.82 RvS and L [2009] EWCA Crim 85.83 Rv......
-
Table of Cases, Volume 78, 2005
...November 2004, CA (Crim) 68–71R v Mirza [2004] UKHL 2 160, 161R v Momodou, February 2005, CA (Crim) 61–65R v Quayle and Others [2005] EWCA Crim 1415, CA (Crim) 169–172The Police Journal, Volume 78 (2005) R v Richardson 1971 CAR 244 63R v Rimmington, R v Goldstein [2005] UKHL 63, HL 262–264R......
-
Drug Sentencing: What's the Deal? The New Sentencing Regime for Drug Offences
...of Mary’ [2001] Crim LR 515.27 See Rv Altham (Lee) [2006] EWCA Crim 7, [2006] 1 WLR 3287 where Mance LJ’scomments in Rv Quayle [2005] EWCA Crim 1415, [2005] 1 WLR 3642 at [67] werecited.28 [2005] EWCA Crim 1415, [2005] 1 WLR 3642.29 In R v Quayle the Court of Appeal pointed out that cannabi......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...the government’s pro-posals on reforming the law on involuntary manslaughter issuedin 2000.Defence of NecessityR v Quayle and Others [2005] EWCA Crim 1415Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)27 May 2002Defence of necessity; Customs and Excise ManagementAct 1979; Misuse of Drugs Act 1971; pain......
Get Started for Free
