Attorney General v Birmingham, Tame and Rea District Drainage Board
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1910 |
| Date | 1910 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Attorney General (S.P.U.C.) v Open Door Counselling Ltd
...61 Cr. App. R. 118; [1975] R.T.R. 473. The State (Quinn) v. Ryan [1965] I.R. 70. Attorney General v. Birmingham District Drainage Board [1910] 1 Ch. 48. Attorney General v. Harris [1960] 1 Q.B. 31; [1959] 3 W.L.R. 205; [1959] 2 All E.R. 393. Attorney General v. Bastow [1957] 1 Q.B. 514; [19......
-
Howard v Commissioners for Public Works (No. 3)
...Counselling Ltd. (No. 2) [1994] 2 I.R. 333; [1994] 1 I.L.R.M. 256. Attorney General v. Birmingham, Tame & Rea District Drainage Board [1910] 1 Ch. 48; [1911-1913] All E.R. Rep. 926; 79 L.J. Ch. 137; 101 L.T. 796; 74 J.P. 57; 26 T.L.R. 93; 54 Sol. Jo. 198; 8 L.G.R. 110, C.A.; [1912] A.C. 788......
-
Legge (George) & Son Ltd v Wenlock Corporation
...quality of the water in the stream will not be affected or deteriorated. ( A.G. v. Birmingham, Tame and Rea District Drainage Board, 1910, 1 Ch. 48; 1912, A.C. 788.) Section 3 of the Rivers Pollution Prevention Act, however, contains no similar implication, except as regards channels used, ......
-
Belton v Nicholl
...S. 263. (6) 2 Jur. N. S. 931. (1) [1922] 1 Ch. 502. (1) Ir. R. 10 Eq. 460, at p. 468. (1) [1921] 1 K. B. 239. (1) [1899] 2 Ch. 608. (2) [1910] 1 Ch. 48. (3) [1912] A. C. 788. (4) [1918] A. C. 485. (1) [1924] 2 Ch. (1) [1922] 1 Ch. 502. ...
Get Started for Free