Attorney General v Birmingham, Tame and Rea District Drainage Board

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1912
Year1912
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • Ananda v Felixia Varnakulasinghe and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Doucet-Boudreau et al. v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 6 Noviembre 2003
    ...361 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 71]. Attorney-General v. Birmingham, Tame and Rea District Drainage Board, [1910] 1 Ch. 48 (C.A.), affd. [1912] A.C. 788 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Kennard v. Cory Brothers and Co., [1922] 1 Ch. 265, affd. [1922] 2 Ch. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 72]. Chandler v. Albe......
  • Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 6 Noviembre 2003
    ...Board No. 50 (1983), 48 N.B.R. (2d) 361; Attorney-General v. Birmingham, Tame, and Rea District Drainage Board, [1910] 1 Ch. 48, aff’d [1912] A.C. 788; Kennard v. Cory Brothers and Co., [1922] 1 Ch. 265, aff’d [1922] 2 Ch. 1; Chandler v. Alberta Association of Architects, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 84......
  • R (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 Julio 2005
    ...has falsified the basis on which discretionary relief was granted ( Attorney General v Birmingham, Tame and Rees District Drainage Board [1912] AC 788, 802); iii) Where the passage of time since a trial has falsified a conclusion of the trial court based on complaints of delay ( EMA v ACAS ......
  • Get Started for Free