Attorney General v Blake

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Judgment Date19 April 1996
Date19 April 1996

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Dream Property Sdn Bhd v Atlas Housing Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Marathon Asset Management LLP and Another v James Seddon and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 22 February 2017
    ...by Blake as a member of the intelligence services, the Crown had not alleged or shown that this information remained confidential: see [1997] Ch 84. When the case reached the House of Lords, the Crown did not maintain that Blake was in breach of a fiduciary duty but relied on the fact that,......
  • Muniandy a/l Nadasan and Others v Dato’ Prem Krishna Sahgal and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2016
  • Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 June 2010
    ... ... One is a right against Mr Cushnie personally; the other is a right against VTFL. General principles ... 23 Let me start with what I think are ... also have to deal with the precedential status of the decision of the Privy Council in Attorney-General for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] 1 AC 324 ... My task is not to provide a definitive statement ... But Sir Richard Scott V-C in Attorney General v Blake [1997] Ch 84, 96 and the Court of Appeal in Halifax Building Society v Thomas [1996] Ch ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...That business belonged to the [employer]. The [defendant] was in breach of its contractual obligation.”) 215 Attorney General v. Blake, [1997] Ch. 84, rev’d on other grounds [1998] Ch. 439 (C.A.), aff’d [2001] A.C. 268 (H.L.) [Blake]. 80 T H E CAN ADI AN C L A SS ACT ION R E V IE W by Lord ......
  • An Old Snail in a New Bottle? Waiver of Tort as An Independent Cause of Action
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...That business belonged to the [employer]. The [defendant] was in breach of its contractual obligation.”) 215 Attorney General v. Blake, [1997] Ch. 84, rev’d on other grounds [1998] Ch. 439 (C.A.), aff’d [2001] A.C. 268 (H.L.) [Blake]. 80 T H E CAN ADI AN C L A SS ACT ION R E V IE W by Lord ......
  • Waiving Goodbye: The Rise and Imminent Fall of Waiver of Tort in Class Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...That business belonged to the [employer]. The [defendant] was in breach of its contractual obligation.”) 215 Attorney General v. Blake, [1997] Ch. 84, rev’d on other grounds [1998] Ch. 439 (C.A.), aff’d [2001] A.C. 268 (H.L.) [Blake]. 80 T H E CAN ADI AN C L A SS ACT ION R E V IE W by Lord ......
  • Strategies to Avoid Or Mitigate Class Action Litigation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...That business belonged to the [employer]. The [defendant] was in breach of its contractual obligation.”) 215 Attorney General v. Blake, [1997] Ch. 84, rev’d on other grounds [1998] Ch. 439 (C.A.), aff’d [2001] A.C. 268 (H.L.) [Blake]. 80 T H E CAN ADI AN C L A SS ACT ION R E V IE W by Lord ......
  • Get Started for Free