Attorney General v Esher Linoleum Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1901
Date1901
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Lye Thean Soo and Others v Syarikat Warsaw
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Walsh v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...Council Defendant Cases mentioned in this report:- Albert v. Tremblay (1963) 49 M.P.R. 407. Attorney-General v. Esher Linoleum Co. Ltd. [1901] 2 Ch. 647; [1900-3] All E.R. Rep 743. Attorney-General and Newton Abbot Rural District Council v. Dyer [1947] 1 Ch. 67; [1946] 2 All E.R. 252. Barra......
  • R v West Sussex Quarter Sessions, ex parte Albert and Maud Johnson Trust Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 May 1973
    ...before the landowner built the drive, and that, after he built it, the public used the drive instead, see A. G. v. Esher Lincoln (1901) 2 Ch. 647. In any case, in 1903, when the strict settlement was broken, Mr Buchanan may not have acted with sufficient promptness to exclude the inference ......
  • Ware Urban District Council v Gaunt
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...ChD 5 Attorney General v Beynon [1970] 1 Ch 1, [1969] 2 WLR 1447, [1969] 2 All ER 263, ChD 85 Attorney-General v Esher Linoleum Co Ltd [1901] 2 Ch 647, 70 LJ Ch 808, 85 LT 414, ChD 26 Attorney General v Horner (1885) 11 App Cas 66, 50 JP 564, 55 LJQB 193, HL 18 Attorney General v Stokesley ......
  • Creation of Rights of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...depends on the circumstances. In one case, 18 months was held to be sufficient. 71 66 Attorney-General v Esher Linoleum Company Ltd [1901] 2 Ch 647. 67 (1788) 1 Hy Bl 51, 60. See, however, R v Oxfordshire County Council ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council [1999] 3 WLR 160, and R (Beresford)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT