Attorney General v Esher Linoleum Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Lye Thean Soo and Others v Syarikat Warsaw
-
Walsh v Sligo County Council
...Council Defendant Cases mentioned in this report:- Albert v. Tremblay (1963) 49 M.P.R. 407. Attorney-General v. Esher Linoleum Co. Ltd. [1901] 2 Ch. 647; [1900-3] All E.R. Rep 743. Attorney-General and Newton Abbot Rural District Council v. Dyer [1947] 1 Ch. 67; [1946] 2 All E.R. 252. Barra......
- Ware Urban District Council v Gaunt
-
R v West Sussex Quarter Sessions, ex parte Albert and Maud Johnson Trust Ltd
...before the landowner built the drive, and that, after he built it, the public used the drive instead, see A. G. v. Esher Lincoln (1901) 2 Ch. 647. In any case, in 1903, when the strict settlement was broken, Mr Buchanan may not have acted with sufficient promptness to exclude the inference ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Creation of Rights of Way
...depends on the circumstances. In one case, 18 months was held to be sufficient. 71 66 Attorney-General v Esher Linoleum Company Ltd [1901] 2 Ch 647. 67 (1788) 1 Hy Bl 51, 60. See, however, R v Oxfordshire County Council ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council [1999] 3 WLR 160, and R (Beresford)......
-
Table of Cases
...ChD 5 Attorney General v Beynon [1970] 1 Ch 1, [1969] 2 WLR 1447, [1969] 2 All ER 263, ChD 85 Attorney-General v Esher Linoleum Co Ltd [1901] 2 Ch 647, 70 LJ Ch 808, 85 LT 414, ChD 26 Attorney General v Horner (1885) 11 App Cas 66, 50 JP 564, 55 LJQB 193, HL 18 Attorney General v Stokesley ......