Attorney General v Harris

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1959
Year1959
CourtAssizes
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Attorney General (S.P.U.C.) v Open Door Counselling Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 March 1988
    ...State (Quinn) v. Ryan [1965] I.R. 70. Attorney General v. Birmingham District Drainage Board [1910] 1 Ch. 48. Attorney General v. Harris [1960] 1 Q.B. 31; [1959] 3 W.L.R. 205; [1959] 2 All E.R. 393. Attorney General v. Bastow [1957] 1 Q.B. 514; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 340; [1957] 1 All E.R. 497. Ca......
  • Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 January 1977
    ...held that the court must accept the discretion exercised by the Attorney-General to authorise the action. 96 Attorney-General v. Harris 1960 1 Q.B. 31 was another example. There, Mr. Justice Salmon (as he then was) said in his judgment at first instance he had "no hesitation in holding in ......
  • Fredericton (City) v. New Brunswick (Attorney General) et al., [1967] N.B. Law News No. 79 (CA)
    • Canada
    • 12 July 1967
    ...[62] The law and practice in very similar cases is set forth in Attorney-General ex relatione Manchester Corporation v. Harris et al. (1959), 2 All E.R. 393; London County Council v. Attorney-General et al. (1902), A.C. 165; Attorney General v. Wilson (1901), 70 L.J.Ch. 234; Attorney-Genera......
  • Fredericton (City) v. New Brunswick (Attorney General) et al., [1967] N.B. Law News No. 79 (CA)
    • Canada
    • 12 July 1967
    ...[62] The law and practice in very similar cases is set forth in Attorney-General ex relatione Manchester Corporation v. Harris et al. (1959), 2 All E.R. 393; London County Council v. Attorney-General et al. (1902), A.C. 165; Attorney General v. Wilson (1901), 70 L.J.Ch. 234; Attorney-Genera......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT