Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1919
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Government of Malaysia v Mahan Singh
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 April 1964
    ...the prerogative right curtailed by legislation. 109As the Master of the Rolls pertinently said in his judgment in the Court of Appeal ( [1919] 2 Ch. 197): "What use would there be in imposing limitations, if the Crown could at its pleasure disregard them and fall back on prerogative?". 110......
  • Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House - First Division)
    • 14 March 1963
    ...Pickford, L.J., at p. 661; Halsbury's Laws of England, (3rd ed.) vol. vii, p. 260;Attorney-General v. De Keyser's Royal HotelELRELR, [1919] 2 Ch. 197, Swinfen Eady, M.R., at p. 225, Warrington, L.J., at p. 237, [1920] A. C. 508, Lord Dunedin at pp. 524–529, Lord Atkinson at pp. 539, 541–542......
  • Re Herbert Berry Associates Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Statute, those powers can only be so exercised. While the Statute is in force the prerogative power is "merged in it" (Swinfen Eady M.R. [1919] 2 Ch 197 at page 216) or "in abeyance" (Lord Atkinson [1920] AC 508, at pages 539-40). On this last page Lord Atkinson continued: Whichever mode of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Democracy, Liberty and the Prerogative: The Displacement of Inherent Executive Power by Statute
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...particulars'). 73 Swinfen Eady MR and Warrington LJ, Duke LJ dissenting. 74 Re a Petition of Right of De Keyser's Royal Hotel Limited [1919] 2 Ch 197, 216–7, relying on the exceptions to the strict rule that the prerogative cannot be taken away except by express words or necessary implicati......
  • The Limits and Use of Executive Power by Government
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...147 De Keyser [1920] AC 508, 539-40 (Lord Atkinson), 554 (Lord Moulton), 561–2 (Lord Sumner). 148 In re De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd [1919] 2 Ch 197, 216, adopted in De Keyser [1920] AC 508, 526 (Lord Dunedin), 539 (Lord Atkinson). 149 Ibid 526. See likewise, at 576 (Lord Parmoor): '[W]here ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT