Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1920
Year1920
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
85 cases
  • R v Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, ex parte Mahmood and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 2001
    ... ... unless he satisfies the Council that he has received such a general education as the Council consider adequate for a registered pharmaceutical ... otherwise be uncertain" (per Lord Radcliffe in St Aubyn (LM) v Attorney General (No 2) [1951] 2 All E R 473 at 498). In any event it seems clear ... of the House of Lords in Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel [1920] AC 508 but, as Mr Pleming points out, it is important to ... But under the principle in Attorney General v De Keysers Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] AC 508 , if Parliament has conferred on the ... ...
  • R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Newham London Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 27 February 2009
    ... ... Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL ... the principle laid down by the House of Lords in Attorney-General v. De Keyser's Royal Hotel Limited [1920] AC 508 ... ...
  • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 November 1994
    ...upon the exercise of that power in that manner being inconsistent with statutory law. It is perhaps put most clearly by Lord Parmoor in the De Keyser case [1920] AC 508 at 575: "The constitutional principle is that the power of the executive to interfere with the property or liberty of subj......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT