Attorney General v Mersey Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1906
Date1906
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 January 1991
    ...be seen, Part I of Schedule 13 to the Act of 1972 imposes restrictions on the borrowing powers of local authorities. 37In Attorney-General v. Mersey Railway Co. [1907] A.C. 415, a railway company was held not entitled to run a number of omnibuses which it claimed were incidental to the rail......
  • Bell Houses Ltd v City Wall Properties Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 1 April 1966
    ... ... 3 Bell Houses Limited is a private company limited by shares and its principal business in fact is the ... 20 (a) To carry on the trade or business of general, civil and engineering contractors and in particular but ... Attorney-General 1902 Appeal Oases 165 ) and ( Attorney-General ... ( Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Company v. Riche 1875) Law Reports 7 ... ...
  • Irish Land Commission v Forde
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 20 December 1917
    ... ... to the remedy given them by the statute: see Attorney-General v. Great Eastern Railway ( 1 ); Baroness Wenlock ... held to be outside the authorized objects of the company. Here the question is whether the estate lawfully acquired ... Smith ( 1 ); Attorney-General v. Mersey Railway Co. ( 2 ). As owners pending re-sale the ... ...
  • Dundee Harbour Trustees v Nicol (D. & J.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 10 December 1914
    ... ... In Attorney-General v. Great Eastern Ry. Co. F2 , where a question was raised as to the power of the railway company to let out its rolling stock to another company, ... Attorney-General F6 and Attorney-General v. Mersey Ry. Co. F7 are distinguishable on this ground ... 2. As ... ...
  • Get Started for Free