Attorney General v Ryan

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1980
Date1980
Year1980
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
99 cases
  • Joseph and Boyce v Attorney General et Al
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • 31 May 2005
    ...clause in very similar terms contained in an Act of Parliament”. 56 Although Lord Diplock did not refer to Harrikissoon, in Attorney General v. Ryan [1980] A.C. 718, another JCPC case decided six months later, he considered the effect of the ouster provisions of The Bahamas Nationality Act,......
  • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fayed
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 November 1996
    ...of law." 31The same approach was subsequently adopted in a number of cases but for present purposes it suffices to refer to A.G. v Ryan [1980] AC 718 a decision of the Privy Council which I regard as being of the greatest importance to the outcome of this case. Ryan involved an application......
  • R v Diggines, ex parte Rahmani
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 March 1986
    ...Commission, [1969] 2 Appeal Cases 147; Hoffman-La Roshe v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] Appeal Cases 295; Attorney General v. Ryan [1980] Appeal Cases 143, where Lord Diplock said (at p.727 D) that it was a necessary implication that a Minister, who had legal authority t......
  • Masilaman Vellasamy v Attorney General and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 July 1987
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Contemporary issues of bias in adjudication
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 10-2, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...or suspicion of bias. The merefact of his interest is sufficient to disqualify him unless he has made sufficient disclosure." 43 33 [1980] A.C. 718. 34 Wade and Forsyth, Administrative Law 7 lh edn. (1994) p. 465. 35 Ibid at n.9. 36 Isaacs)v.Robertson [1985] A.G 97. 37 In Re Pinochet (1999)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT