Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Reid,Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest,Lord Diplock,Lord Simon of Glaisdale,Lord Cross of Chelsea
Judgment Date25 July 1973
Judgment citation (vLex)[1973] UKHL J0725-2
Date25 July 1973
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
356 cases
19 books & journal articles
  • Popular Names Index to UK Cases and EU Legislation and Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Legal Research. A Practitioner's Handbook - 3rd Edition Appendices
    • 30 August 2019
    ...of 19 January 2001 on summer-time arrangements (OJ 2001 L31/21) Sunday Times Thalidomide Cases Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273 (HL) The Sunday Times v The United Kingdom (No 1) [1979] ECHR 1 Sunday Trading Cases WH Smith Do it All Ltd v Peterborough City Council (No 3)......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...General v Newspaper Publishing Ltd [1988] Ch 333, [1987] 3 WLR 942, [1987] 3 All ER 276, CA 203 Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273, [1973] 3 WLR 298, [1973] 3 All ER 54, HL 203 Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1992] 1 AC 191, [1991] 2 WLR 994, [1991] 2 All ER 398,......
  • Alexander Meiklejohn, American Constitutional Law, and Australia's Implied Freedom of Political Communication
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 34-3, September 2006
    • 1 September 2006
    ...broad and deep recognition of the free speech value throughout the British Commonwealth. See, eg, Attorney-General v Times Newspaper Ltd [1974] AC 273, 315 (Lord Simon of Glaisdale); Attorney-General v The Guardian [1987] 1 WLR 1248, 1286 (Lord Bridge, dissenting); SDGMR v Dolphin delivery ......
  • Should advocates' immunity continue?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 No. 1, April - April 2004
    • 1 April 2004
    ...although this power is not limited to legal practitioners. On the principles governing contempt, see A-G (UK) v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273, 309 (Lord Diptock) and Australian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98, 106-9 (Gibbs CJ, Mason, Wilson......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT