Attwood v Lamont

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1920
Date1920
CourtKing's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Orme; Thomas Cowan & Company Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1961
  • British Reinforced Concrete Engineering Company v Schelff
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Attwood v. Lamont [ 1920 ] 2 K. B. 146 ; [ 1920 ] 3 K. B. 571 applied ... Held , also, that assuming severance was allowed, and assuming ... ...
  • Cavendish Square Holdings Bv and Another v Talal El Makdessi
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 14 December 2012
    ... ... he has to sell: Nordenfelt v The Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535 , Mason v Provident Clothing (supra) and Attwood v Lamont [1920] 3 KB 571 : see also Ronbar Enterprises Ltd v Green [1954] 1WLR at 820 and at 821 per Jenkins LJ: "It is obvious that in many ... ...
  • Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 July 2019
    ...cases out of ten he is very ill able to afford …” 61 Thus was the stage set for the decisions in Attwood v Lamont, first of the Divisional Court of the King's Bench Division, [1920] 2 KB 146, and then of the Court of Appeal, [1920] 3 KB 571. The claimant, who carried on business in Kiddermi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Fundamentals of Franchising - Canada, Second Edition
    • 9 June 2017
    ...(CanLII) (Can.): 234 Atlas Supply Co. of Canada v. Yarmouth Equipment Ltd ., [1991] N.S.J. No. 178 (N.S.C.A.): 200 Attwood v. Lamont , [1920] 2 K.B. 146 (Div. Ct.): 162 Automobiles Duclos Inc . v. Ford du Canada Ltée , J.E. 2002-1859 (S.C.): 41 B.C. Rail Partnership v. TrentonWorks Ltd., 28......
  • The Canadian Franchise Agreement
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Fundamentals of Franchising - Canada, Second Edition
    • 9 June 2017
    ...the non-competition covenant still makes sense. Generally, Canadian courts will not rewrite restrictive covenants ( Attwood v. Lamont , [1920] 2 K.B. 146 (Div. Ct.), reversed [1920] 3 K.B. 571 (C.A.); TMI Turf Management Inc. v. R. DeNoble Enterprises Ltd. , (1994) 54 C.C.E.L. (2d) 165 (B.C......