Austerberry v Corporation of Oldham
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1884 |
| Year | 1884 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
42 cases
-
Rhone and Another v Stephens (executrix)
...against successors in title of the land. The House of Lords so held in affirming the rule in Austerberry v Oldham CorporationELRTLR ((1885) 29 ChD 750) and dismissing an appeal by the plaintiffs, Mr and Mrs R J Rhone, from the Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Nourse and Lord Justice Steyn) (Th......
-
Jones v Price
...page 329); but since it is a positive obligation, this assumption cannot survive the decision of the Court of Appeal in Austerberry v. Oldham Corporation (29 Chancery Division, page 750). It was not in any event easy to reconcile with Spencer's case. ( 1583, 5 Coke, 16A). In theory, therefo......
-
Smith and Snipes Hall Farm v River Douglas Catchment Board
... ... Adopting the definition of Bayley J. in Congleton Corporation v. Pattison F6 the covenant must either affect the land as regards mode of occupation, or it must ... Furthermore, much of the reasoning of Lindley L.J. in Austerberry v. Corporation, of Oldham F13 , is applicable. Although work might have to be done on the land ... ...
-
Owners, Strata Plan LMS 3905 v. Crystal Square Parking Corp.
...to: Rhone v. Stephens, [1994] 2 A.C. 310; Tulk v. Moxhay (1848), 2 Ph. 774, 41 E.R. 1143; Austerberry v. Corporation of Oldham (1885), 29 Ch. D. 750; Noble v. Alley, [1951] S.C.R. 64; Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 19, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 306; Parkinson v. Reid, [1966] ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15 19, 2017)
...run with freehold land, whether in law or in equity. This rule is commonly referred to as the rule in Austerberry v. Oldham Corpn. (1885), 29 Ch. D. 750 (C.A.), which has clearly been adopted in Canada: Parkinson v. Reid, [1966] S.C.R. 162. The appellants argue that, as no exception to this......