Avnet Incorporated v Isoact Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1998
Date1998

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Pathway IP Sarl (formerly Regus No. 2 Sarl) v Easygroup Ltd (formerly Easygroup IP Licensing Ltd)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 21 December 2018
    ...be cautious about the potential width of certain service marks and rightly reminded himself of the observation of Jacob J in Avnet, Inc v Isoact Ltd [1998] FSR 16 who said at page 19: “In my view, specifications for services should be scrutinised carefully and they should not be given a wid......
  • Easygroup Ltd v Nuclei Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 13 April 2022
    ...renting office space, but that is not sufficient to engage the provisions of s. 10(1)/Article 9(2)(a). As Jacob LJ held in Avnet v Isoact [1998] FSR 16, p. 19, in the context of an infringement case, specifications for services are to be scrutinised carefully, and should not be given a wide......
  • Multi-Access Ltd v Guanghzhou Wong Lo Kat Great Health Business Development Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 December 2019
    ...electrical machinery it was not at the time of registration put in the class concerned.” 92 Jacob J returned to the question in Avnet Inc v Isoact [1998] FSR 16, where he said (at page 19): “These words “included in class X” in a specification of goods not infrequently cause difficulty. You......
  • Oao "Alfa-Bank" v Alpha Bank A.E.
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 July 2011
    ... ... have directed himself, in addition, by reference to the following dictum of Jacob J in Avnet v. Isoact [1997] ETMR 562 [1998] FSR 16 , at 19: "In my view, specifications ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Disputes & Litigation Over Domain Names
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 5 July 2001
    ...to the complainant's trade mark. This may not be as easy as it sounds if the decision of the English High Court in Avnet Inc v Isoact Ltd [1998] FSR 16 is anything go by. In that case the defendant was an ISP that used the domain name 'avnet.co.uk' and the plaintiff was the owner of the tra......
2 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...carefully, so as to ensure that it is not given a wide construction covering a vast range of goods or services (see Avnet Inc v Isoact Ltd[1998] FSR 16). Once the double identity is established, there is a presumption that a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public has arisen as a ......
  • Table of cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Modern Intellectual Property Law. Third Edition
    • Invalid date
    ...Mac Cop Cas 398 362 Australian Broadcasting Corp v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 753 Autonomy Corp Ltd [2008] EWHC 85 125 Avnet Inc v Isoact Ltd [1998] FSR 16 588 B B & R Relays’ Application [1985] RPC 1 70 BBC Enterprises v Hi Tech Xtravision [1990] Ch 609 314–15 BBC v BSB [1991]......