Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company [QBD (Comm)]
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Rix J. |
| Judgment Date | 08 May 1998 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Date | 08 May 1998 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
71 cases
-
Peterson Farms Inc. v C & M Farming Ltd
... ... which C & M Farming ("C & M"), an Indian company as I understand it, to which I have already ... ...
-
Norscot Rig Management PVT Ltd v Essar Oilfields Services Ltd
... ... [2010] EWHC 195 (Comm) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ... It is clear, from Azov Shipping Co v The Baltic Shipping Co [1999] 2 ... Tollefsen from a subsidiary company of Mike Mullen Energy Equipment Resources Inc for ... ...
-
Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [SC]
...Act 1996, just as he would be entitled under s.72 if he had taken no part before the arbitrator: see e.g. Azov Shipping Co. v Baltic Shipping Co. [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 68. The English and French legal positions thus coincide: see the Pyramids case (para 20 27 The question is whether the posi......
-
AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC
...or in an application to stay judicial proceedings on the ground that the parties have agreed to arbitrate. Thus in Azov Shipping Co v Baltic Shipping Co [1999] 1 All ER 476 Rix J decided that where there was a substantial issue of fact as to whether a party had entered into an arbitration a......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
THE USE AND ABUSE OF ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS
...Oils Ltd v The Owners/Demise Charterers of the Vessel Marine Champion[2002] EWHC 2407 at [16]; Azov Shipping Co v Baltic Shipping Co[1999] 1 All ER 476. See also William Park, “Determining Arbitral Jurisdiction: Allocation of Tasks between Courts and Arbitrators”(2000) 9 ADRLJ 19 at 29. 42[......