Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1999
Date1999
Year1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Fluor Ltd v Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 7 October 2016
    ...suggest that an estoppel by representation of law may now be raised, quoting Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln CC [1999] 2 AC 349 and [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159." Estoppel by representation– the facts 570 In this case I do not consider that the representation made by Fluor, namely that the cost......
  • Rimpacific Navigation Inc. and Another v Daehan Shipbuilding Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 24 November 2009
    ...96: see para. 106. ii) The proposition was expressly considered and rejected by Colman J in Azov Shipping Co v Baltic Shipping Co [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159: “It was further argued on behalf of Baltic that, if the agreement were not invalid under Ukrainian law, then even if there were no act......
  • The Republic of Serbia v Imagesat International NV
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 November 2009
    ...issue, for his jurisdiction can only be founded on the very mutual assent which is in issue": Azov Shipping Co. v Baltic [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159, at 161, per Colman J. See also Electrosteel v Scan-Trans [2003] 1 Lloyds Rep 190, at [20]- [22] and The Ythan [2006] 1 Lloyd's Rep 9 The othe......
  • Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi as v Vsc Steel Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 19 December 2013
    ...which Habas is located. 125 There is clear authority that the Regulations do not affect the question of ostensible authority — see, Azov v Baltic Shipping Co [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159, 170; Rimpacific Navigation Inc v Daehan Shipbuilding Co Ltd [2012] 2 All ER 814 at [30]-[31]; Golden Ocean ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS, CONSIDERATION AND MORAL HAZARD
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...[1999] 3 SLR 464. 110 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387. 111 See also Azov Shipping Co v Baltic Shipping Co[1999] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 159 at 179; Thornton Springer v NEM Insurance Co Ltd[2000] 2 All ER 489 at 519. 112 This is also necessary for estoppel....

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT