Azov Shipping Company v Baltic Shipping Company (No.2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • X v Y (Defendant/Applicant) Y X
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 7 May 2013
    ... ... (as he then was) in Azov v Baltic [1999)] 2 Lloyd's Reports 39. He held ... by X is a shareholding in a subsidiary company there must be doubt as to whether such asset is ... ...
  • A v B
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 December 2010
    ... ... starting with Rix J (as he then was) in Azov Shipping v Baltic Shipping [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep ... submits that A as a Kazakh private company with no presence in the United Kingdom is under ... ...
  • The Republic of Serbia v Imagesat International NV
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 November 2009
    ...he was correct in deciding that he did. It does so without any preconception that the arbitrator made the right decision: Azov Shipping Co. v Baltic Shipping Co. [1999] 2 Lloyds Rep 39, at 41, per Longmore J. The arbitrator's determination can only be provisional. It "cannot be conclusive ......
  • A. Ltd v B. Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 2 February 2015
    ...approach the question " wholly afresh and without any preconception that [the arbitrator] has made the right decision": Azov Shipping Co. v. Baltic Shipping Co (No.2) [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 716 per Longmore J. at 719. That approach was approved by the Supreme Court in Dallah Real Estate and......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT