B. (orse. P.) v Attorney General

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Date1965
Year1965

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Commonwealth of Australia v State of Tasmania
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 1 July 1983
    ...19201942 and has again meant very little since about 1950, but could become a real factor once again (Australian Federalism in the Courts (1967) p 119; see also Burmester: The Presumption of Constitutionality, Federal Law Review, vol 13 (1983)). Wynes states: In construing an enactment the ......
  • Clibbery v Allan and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 14 June 2001
    ...is in the Family Division no general power inherited from the old ecclesiastical court to sit in camera (see B (orse P) v A-G [1967] P 119 at 121, [1965] 3 All ER 253 at 254). In my judgment Scott v Scott established once and for all that there is in principle no difference for these purpos......
  • The Queen v B (1969) No561
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 March 1969
    ...has been made by the Privy Council in Mahlikilili [1943] 1 All ER 463, and there is the further case of B v The Attorney–General [1965] 3 All ER 253. Archbold (36th ed) at para 541 states that at common law a trial on indictment or criminal information must be held in a public court with op......
  • Barritt v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • The Founding of the French Third Republic
    • United States
    • Sage Comparative Political Studies No. 43-8-9, August 2010
    • 1 August 2010
    ...that the troops would immediately rebel against any government that forced them to serve under the white flag of the royalists (Brown, 1967, p. 119). Given these realities, most French politicians—including most of the legitimists themselves—were sure that Chambord would soon find a way to ......
  • Costs and Quality of Care in Different Types of Hospitals
    • United States
    • Sage ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The No. 399-1, January 1972
    • 1 January 1972
    ...Long and Paul Feldstein. "Eco-nomics of Hospital Systems: Peak Loads andRegional Coördination," American EconomicReview 57, 2 (May, 1967), pp. 119-129. ...
  • Recent Developments in Archaeology
    • United States
    • Sage ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The No. 408-1, July 1973
    • 1 July 1973
    ...American 11, P. S. Martin, "The Revolution in Archaeology," Scientific American 217, no. 2 Archaeology," American Antiquity 36, no. 1 (1967), pp. 119-122. (1971), pp. what has been done within the new With the development of the eco- framework system concept and modern ecology,anthropologis......
  • Examining the Utility of Fish and Kroenig's Legislative Powers Survey in Assessing the Effectiveness of Nigeria's National Assembly
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press African Journal of International and Comparative Law No. , October 2015
    • 1 October 2015
    ...in a loose way equated with separation of powers.5757M. J. C. Vile, Constittutionalism and the Separation of Powers, Clarendon Press (1967), pp. 119–75. At the start of the American Revolution, the fear indeed was of a tyrannical legislative branch – a branch that might impede the smooth ru......