B v B (Financial Provision)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • P v P (Financial Provision)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Baptiste v Baptiste
    • Bermuda
    • Court of Appeal (Bermuda)
    • 2 April 2002
    ...to destroy the husband's virtually sole source of income (see Potter v. Potter [1982] 3 All E.R. 321; B v. B (Financial Provision) [1989] 1 F.L.R. 119). Care would have to be taken that, if included in the family assets for apportionment, that did not happen. 18 Clearly the judge was right ......
  • N v N
    • Hong Kong
    • Family Court (Hong Kong)
    • 5 February 1997
    ...to balance the reasonable needs and just requirements of an applicant spouse against the other party’s ability to meet them : B v. B [1989] 1 FLR 119, Delaney v. Delaney [1990] 2 FLR 457 CA. In other words, the proper approach is to look at need within the context of s. 7 (1) of the Matrimo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT