B v H (Habitual Residence: Wardship)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
- The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and the Hague Convention and CS, a minor: PAS v AFS
-
S (PA) v S (AF)
...would also be inconsistent with authority." 48 There is, however, some English authority to the contrary. inB v H (Habitual Residence), [2002] 1 FLR 388, Charles J postulated the possible example of "the unexpectedly early birth to a married couple who are habitually resident in England dur......
-
Foyle Health Trust v E.C.
...CHILD ABDUCTION EEC REG 2201/2003 EEC REG 2201/2003 ART 15 EEC REG 2201/2003 ART 15(2)(a) B v H (HABITUAL RESIDENCE: WARDSHIP) 2002 1 FLR 388 W & B v H (CHILD ABDUCTION: SURROGACY) 2002 1 FLR 1008 HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION ART 12 M (C) v DELEGACION P......
-
Health Service Executive of Ireland v Am (Mother) and Others
...resident there. I consider, with respect, that it follows that the decision of Charles J in B v H (habitual residence: Warship) [2002] 1 FLR 388 was, as regards child H, wrong. Charles J found that H was habitually resident in England and Wales, but the child had never been there and so the......
Request a trial to view additional results