B. v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Year | 1958 |
| Date | 1958 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
- C (A Minor) v DPP
-
Rigby v ND
...“under the age of 15 years”. 23 The reference to “strong and pregnant evidence” had come from the judgment of Lord Parker LCJ in B v R (1958) 44 Cr App R 1, cited with approval by the Queensland Court of Criminal Appeal in R v B (an infant) [1979] Qd R 417 at 425. Davies JA said that the co......
-
Lord et Al v Requena
...and his subsequent identification of the medico-legal report in the court below. That omission to my mind was fatal for on the authority of R v Hart (1932) 23 Cr. App. R., 202 - …“Failure to cross-examine a witness on some material part of his evidence, ….. may be treated as an acceptance o......
-
R v B
...background was brought in. 12 The other case is most conveniently reported in The Times newspaper of 24th April 1959: F. v. PadwickB. v. R. 44 Cr. App. R. 1. For present purposes it suffices to read the headnote only: 10 "A boy aged just under nine was charged at a juvenile court with house......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Unfitness to Plead and the Overlap with Doli Incapax: An Examination of the Law Commission's Proposals for a New Capacity Test
...to naughty or mischievous: JM (A Minor) vRuneckles (1984) 79 Cr AppR 255.23 (1845) 1 Cox CC 265.24 R v Gorrie (1919) 83 JP 136; B v R (1958) 44 Cr App R 1.25 It was famously attacked by Glanville Williams in ‘The Criminal Responsibility ofChildren’ [1954] Crim L R 493, and its abolition was......
