Bailey v Bullock

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Year1950
Date1950

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • Finlay v Murtagh
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1979
    ...p. 149, supra 22 Davies v. Lock (1844) 3 L.T. (O.S.) 125. 23 Bean v. WadeUNK (1885) 2 T.L.R. 157. 24 Bailey v. BullockUNK [1950] 2 All E.R. 1167. 25 Hall v. MeyrickELR [1957] 2 Q.B. 455. 26 Howell v. Young (1826) 5 B.&C. 259. 27 Nocton v. AshburtonELR [1914] A.C. 932. 28 Boorman v. BrownENR......
  • Watts v Morrow
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1991
    ...consequences of the breach which were all foreseeable at the time…" 75Mr Jackson's submission is, I think, correct. In Bailey v. Bullock [1950] 2 All ER 1167, Barry J., in a case of solicitor's negligence, held that damages for inconvenience and discomfort could be recovered for the solicit......
  • Farley v Skinner (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 October 2001
    ...and the parties here had the firm measure of that inconvenience in the damages given by the jury". 58 I also consider that Barry J. in Bailey v Bullock [1950] 2 All ER 1167, 1170–1171 and Beldam LJ in Wapshott v Davis Donovan & Co [1996] PNLR 361, 378 were right to emphasise that there is ......
  • Midland Bank Trust Company Ltd v Hett, Stubbs & Kemp
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 172. Bagot v. Stevens Scanlan & Co. Ltd. [1966] 1 Q.B. 197, [1964] 3 W.L.R. 1162; [1964] 3 All E.R. 577. Bailey v. Bullock [1950] 2 All E.R. 1167. Barnett v. Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969] 1 Q.B. 428; [1968] 2 W.L.R. 422; [1968] 1 All E.R. ......
  • Get Started for Free