Bainbrigge v Browne
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1880 |
| Date | 1880 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 cases
- Bank of New South Wales v Rogers
-
The Poulton Family Trust Between: (1) Michele Alexia Canham (2) James Alexander Poulton (3) Nicholas James Poulton (4) James Michael Poulton (5) Daisy Elizabeth Houghton-Poulton Plaintiffs v (1) Cutty Sark Land Company (2) Deborah McMullan Poulton (3) Wilson Malcolm McMullan (4) Christine Jane McMullan (5) Cayman National Trust Company Ltd (6) CNT (Nominees) Ltd Defendants
...their reversionary interests under their parents' marriage settlement with payment of his mortgage debts: see Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 Ch D 188. 9. In cases of this latter nature the influence one person has over another provides scope for misuse without any specific overt acts of pers......
-
Michele Alexia Canham v Cutty Sark Land Company
...their reversionary interests under their parents' marriage settlement with payment of his mortgage debts: see Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 Ch D 188. 9. In cases of this latter nature the influence one person has over another provides scope for misuse without any specific overt acts of pers......
-
Wong, Wen-Young v (1) Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd, (2) Transglobe Private Trust Company Ltd
...to him. It is for him to produce evidence to counter the inference which otherwise should be drawn. 15. The case of Bainbrigge v Browne, 18 Ch D 188, already mentioned, provides a good illustration of this commonplace type of forensic exercise. Fry J held, at p 196, that there was no direct......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...225Baegen v The Netherlands, ApplicationNo. 16696/90, 27 October 1995 ....64Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 ChD 188........................................................ 225Ballard v North British Railway Co.1923 SC (HL) 43 ............................ 228Bank of Credit and CommerceInternat......
-
English Influences on the Historical Development of Fiduciary Duties in Scottish Law
...34 Beav 457, 55 ER 712; Potts v Surr (1865) 34 Beav 543, 55 ER 745; Turner v Collins (1871–72) LR 7 Ch App 329; Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 Ch D 188; Luddy's Trustee v Peard (1886) LR 33 Ch D 500; Hoblyn v Hoblyn (1889) LR 41 Ch D 200; Liles (n 90) at 683 per Lord Esher MR. See also the i......
-
UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
...with a special disability, and a party unduly influenced is clearly in such a position. See further, Phang, supra n 9 at 566—574. 27 (1881) 18 Ch D 188 at 197. Here though value had been given because the third party forbore to sue. See also Huguenin v Baseley(1807) 14 Ves 273. 28 Though co......
-
Burden of Proof in Undue Influence: Common Law and Codes on Collision Course
...in Equity: With Notes, vol. 1, 9thedn (Sweet & Maxwell: London, 1928) at 232–4; Wright v Carter [1980] 1 Ch 27.18 Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 ChD 188; Lancaster Loans Ltd v Black [1934] 1 KB 380.19 Radcliffe v Price (1902) 18 TLR 466; Mitchell v Homfray (1881) 8 QBD 587; Re CMG [1970] Ch ......
Request a trial to view additional results