Bainbrigge v Browne
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judgment Date | 1880 |
| Year | 1880 |
| Date | 1880 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
53 cases
-
Michele Alexia Canham v Cutty Sark Land Company
...their reversionary interests under their parents' marriage settlement with payment of his mortgage debts: see Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 Ch D 188. 9. In cases of this latter nature the influence one person has over another provides scope for misuse without any specific overt acts of pers......
-
The Poulton Family Trust Between: (1) Michele Alexia Canham (2) James Alexander Poulton (3) Nicholas James Poulton (4) James Michael Poulton (5) Daisy Elizabeth Houghton-Poulton Plaintiffs v (1) Cutty Sark Land Company (2) Deborah McMullan Poulton (3) Wilson Malcolm McMullan (4) Christine Jane McMullan (5) Cayman National Trust Company Ltd (6) CNT (Nominees) Ltd Defendants
...their reversionary interests under their parents' marriage settlement with payment of his mortgage debts: see Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 Ch D 188. 9. In cases of this latter nature the influence one person has over another provides scope for misuse without any specific overt acts of pers......
-
Wong, Wen-Young v (1) Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd, (2) Transglobe Private Trust Company Ltd
...to him. It is for him to produce evidence to counter the inference which otherwise should be drawn. 15. The case of Bainbrigge v Browne, 18 Ch D 188, already mentioned, provides a good illustration of this commonplace type of forensic exercise. Fry J held, at p 196, that there was no direct......
-
O'Regan v White
...2 I. R. 273. (6) 20 L. R. Ir. 341. (7) [1906] 1 I. R. 20. (8) 8 Ir. Ch. R. 37. (1) 2 L. R. Ir. 199, at p. 211. (2) I. R. 5 Eq. 613. (3) 18 Ch. D. 188. (4) [1910] 1 I. R. (1) 5 L. R. Ir. 478. (2) 11 L. R. Ir. 142. (1) [1906] 1 I. R. 20. (1) [1906] 1 I. R. 20. (2) [1905] 1 I. R. 85, at p. 102......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
English Influences on the Historical Development of Fiduciary Duties in Scottish Law
...34 Beav 457, 55 ER 712; Potts v Surr (1865) 34 Beav 543, 55 ER 745; Turner v Collins (1871–72) LR 7 Ch App 329; Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 Ch D 188; Luddy's Trustee v Peard (1886) LR 33 Ch D 500; Hoblyn v Hoblyn (1889) LR 41 Ch D 200; Liles (n 90) at 683 per Lord Esher MR. See also the i......
-
Subject Index
...225Baegen v The Netherlands, ApplicationNo. 16696/90, 27 October 1995 ....64Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 ChD 188........................................................ 225Ballard v North British Railway Co.1923 SC (HL) 43 ............................ 228Bank of Credit and CommerceInternat......
-
UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
...with a special disability, and a party unduly influenced is clearly in such a position. See further, Phang, supra n 9 at 566—574. 27 (1881) 18 Ch D 188 at 197. Here though value had been given because the third party forbore to sue. See also Huguenin v Baseley(1807) 14 Ves 273. 28 Though co......
-
Burden of Proof in Undue Influence: Common Law and Codes on Collision Course
...in Equity: With Notes, vol. 1, 9thedn (Sweet & Maxwell: London, 1928) at 232–4; Wright v Carter [1980] 1 Ch 27.18 Bainbrigge v Browne (1881) 18 ChD 188; Lancaster Loans Ltd v Black [1934] 1 KB 380.19 Radcliffe v Price (1902) 18 TLR 466; Mitchell v Homfray (1881) 8 QBD 587; Re CMG [1970] Ch ......
Get Started for Free
