Balfour v Balfour
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1919 |
Year | 1919 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
160 cases
- Nagapushani v Nesaratnam and Another
-
Merritt v Merritt
...the agreement was not intended to have legal relations. It was He says a family arrangement such as was considered by the Court in Balfour v. Balfour. 1919, 2 King's Bench Division, page 571, and in Jones v. Padavatton. 1966, I Weekly Law Reports, page 328. So the wife could riot sue upon i......
- Parker v Clark
-
Diwell v Farnes
...13 Husband and wife cases are in a class by themselves, for the reasons given by Lord Justice Atkins in ( Balfour v. Balfour 1919 2 King's Bench, at page 378) where he pointed out that the ordinary incidents of commerce have no application to the ordinary relations between husband and wife.......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 books & journal articles
-
Interests in the family home: constructive trusts and estoppel compared
...in Australia and New Zealand (based upon unconscionability) operates in situations similar to that of the common intention. 76 72 [1919] 2 K.B.571. 73 See note 55, supra. 74 Although Gardner suggests a possible way forward based on ideas of trust and collaboration (see (1993) 109 L.Q.R. 263......
-
Intention to Create Legal Relations
...of legal enforceability. As we shall see, courts have generally assumed an absence of intention to create legal 1 Balfour v Balfour , [1919] 2 KB 571 (CA). 2 Canadian Taxpayers Federation v Ontario (Minister of Finance) (2002), 73 OR (3d) 621 (SCJ). 118 Intention to Create Legal Relations 1......
-
LEADING THE WAY FOR THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS
...agreement. 152 See para 78 below. 153 Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter [2009] 2 SLR(R) 332 at [72], citing Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571. 154 Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter [2009] 2 SLR(R) 332 at [72], citing Rose and Frank Co v J R Crompton and Brothers, Ltd [1925] AC......
-
Constitutionalizing Procedure
...private litigants may be to the constitution as family members historically were to the law of contract. See Balfour v. Balfour, [1919] 2 K.B. 571 at 579: "The family is a realm in which the King's writ does not seek to run." 29 An example of such thinking is found in R. Nozick, Anarchy, St......
Request a trial to view additional results