Bamfield v Goole and Sheffield Transport Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1910
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • Effort Shipping Company Ltd v Linden Management SA
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 January 1998
    ...are more in accordance with later authorities. 49But when one looks at the later authorities, and in particular at Bamfield v. Goole and Sheffield Transport Co. Ltd. [1910] 2 K.B. 94 and Great Northern Railway Co. v. L.E.P. Transport and Depository Ltd. [1922] 2 K.B. 742 it is the majorit......
  • Effort Shipping Company Ltd v Linden Management S.A. (Giannis NK)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 January 1996
    ...proper care not to deliver dangerous goods without notice. 115 Brass's case was considered in two subsequent Court of Appeal cases, Bamfield v. Goole and Sheffield Transport Co. [1910] 2KB 94 and Great Northern Railway Company v. LEP Transport [1922] 2KB 742. The former case concerned the......
  • The "Sumi Maru 9001"
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 13 November 1992
    ...the duty to him which he is bound by common law (with certain qualifications) to accept: Bamfield v Goole and Sheffield Transport Co [1910] 2 KB 94; but it is quite a different matter to extend the category of common law warranties by adding another one to them, that is to say, by adding to......
  • Ing Hua Fu Marine Line Sdn Bhd v Vitachem (M) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT