Banbury v Bank of Montreal
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1918 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Year | 1918 |
| Date | 1918 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
100 cases
-
Woods v Martins Bank Ltd
...Solicitors: Swinburn G. Wilson & Son, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Griddle, Ord & Muckle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. [Reported by G. M. SMAILES34 T.L.R. 518 (2) That from May 9, 1950, when the bank accepted the plaintiff's instructions the relationship of banker and customer existed between them.......
- A-G for the Straits Settlements v Pang Ah Yew
- Anderson (WB) & Sons Ltd v Rhodes (Liverpool) Ltd
- Mutual Life and Citizens' Assurance Company Ltd v Evatt
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...v. Sea Fire Life Assurance Co. (1857) 3 C.B. (N.S.) 300. 78 Balogun v. Balogun 2 W.A.C.A. 290 at 299 383 Banbury v. Bank of Montreal (1918) A.C. 626 H.L. at 705-706. 435 Banbury v. Bank of Montreal (1918) A.C. 626 H.L. at 705-706. 549 Banigo v. Banigo (1943) 8 W.A.C.A. 148. 456 Bank of Engl......
-
Agreements in Writing
...misrepresentations and would not preclude an action for negligent misrepresentations of this kind. See Banbury v Bank of Montreal , [1918] AC 626 (HL); Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd , [1964] AC 465 (HL). 11 The statute came into force in the Canadian common law provinces by ......
-
Preliminary sections
...v. Faleye (1987) 2 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 54) 51………….........................................................822 Banbury v. Bank of Montreal (1918) A.C. 626 H.L………........................................…..70, 446, 447 Bango v. Chado (1998) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 564) 139………......................................