Bank of Australasia v Palmer

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1897
Year1897
Date1897

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
43 cases
  • Paul Pora v Poliamba Limited (2008) N3582
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 22 August 2008
    ...Cases: Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 E. & B.370; Gillespie Bros. & Co v Cheney Eggar & Co [1896] 2 Q.B. 59; Bank of Australia v. Palmer [1897] AC 540; Bank of New Zealand v Simpson [1900] A.C.182; Reliance Marine Insurance v. Duder [1913] 1 KB 265; Jacobs v Batavia & General Plantations Trust Ltd......
  • Ogilvy & Mather Direct (M) Sdn Bhd v Stamford College Group
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2003
  • Halesowen Presswork & Assemblies Ltd v Westminster Bank Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 January 1972
    ...that evidence seems to have offended against the principle, as laid down, for example by Lord Morris in Bank of Australasia v. Palmer [1897] A.C. 540 at page 545 that "Parol testimony cannot be received to contradict, vary, add to or subtract from the terms of a written contract, or the ter......
  • Liberty Mercian Ltd v Cuddy Civil Engineering Ltd (1st Defendant) Cuddy Demolition and Dismantling Ltd (2nd Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 3 September 2013
    ...intentions, and one which should be placed beyond the reach of future controversy, bad faith or treacherous memory." (See also Bank of Australasia v Palmer [1897] AC 540, 545 , per Lord Morris.) This rule is one of the great strengths of English commercial law and is one of the main reaso......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The theory of implied annexation of restrictive covenants revisited
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 4-1, June 1994
    • 1 June 1994
    ...in which the parties have deliberately agreed to record any part of their contract", per Lord Morris in Bank of Australasia v. Palmer [1897] A.C. 540 at 545. This creates a presumption in the view of Prof. Lord Wedderburn, "Collateral Contracts" [1959] C.L.J. 58 at 62. The Restatement Secon......