Barclays Bank Ltd v W. J. Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1979
Year1979
Date1979
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
200 cases
  • Nurdin and Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden and Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 5 February 1999
    ...said that his conclusions were further supported by the dictum of Mr Justice Robert Goff in Barclays Bank Ltd v W J Simms Son and Cooke (Southern) Ltd and AnotherELR ((1980) 1 QB 677). Mr Justice Robert Goff said that it was not a prerequisite of recovery that the plaintiff must have mistak......
  • Jones v Churcher and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 18 March 2009
    ...impose on the bank an accessory liability for breach of trust. Whilst I consider that the information provided by Lloyds TSBBarclays Bank v W.J. Sims [1980] QB 677. In that case Robert Goff J summarised the relevant principles (at 695C-D) in the following propositions (for which he cited by......
  • Första Ap-Fonden v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 October 2013
    ...authorised it, and the payment is treated as for the bank's own account ( Barclays Bank Ltd v WJ Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd [1980] QB 677 at 699, Robert Goff J). 105 In this case, AP seeks to construe the "safeguard principal" objective as part of the mandate. I do not accept that......
  • Lloyds Bank Plc v Independent Insurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 November 1998
    ...the payee could not be required to restore the money to the payer. (Barclays Bank Ltd v W J Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) LtdELR[1980] QB 677applied.) JUDGMENT Waller LJ: Introduction This is an appeal from the decision of His Honour Judge Hallgarten QC under which he gave judgment in fa......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Madoff Feeder Fund In Major Court Reversal
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 26 July 2012
    ...the shares and this was an absolute bar on the claim. (Referring to Aiken v Short [1856] 1H&N 210 and Barclays Bank v WJ Simms Son [1980] QB 677.) The Court found in favour of Fairfield on the second preliminary issue on an interpretation of what documents constituted certificates as to......
  • Privy Council Rules On Fairfield
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 28 April 2014
    ...and defence under the articles were closely related and in approving Barclays Bank Limited v. W.J. Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd (1980) QB 677, said that if a payment made under a mistake discharges a contractual debt of a payee, that sum cannot be recovered unless the mistake is suc......
  • The billion dollar bewail: Citibank cannot recover $900 million inadvertently wired to lenders
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 11 March 2021
    ... ... Furman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in In re Citibank August 11, ... prepayment of their loan to Revlon, for which the bank was serving as administrative agent, and made no ... recover money paid under a mistake as outlined in Barclays Bank v WJ Sims [1980] QB 677 ... Pursuant to these ... ...
11 books & journal articles
  • Bank Account Operation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Bank and Customer Law in Canada
    • 8 September 2007
    ...any textbook on negotiable instruments for a further discussion. 109 Barclays Bank Ltd . v. W.J. Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd ., [1979] 3 All E.R. 522 (Q.B.) [ Simms ]. 110 Most of the heat in this scholarly interlude has been generated by Crawford, Payment, Clearing and Settlement in C......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 June 2013
    ...282, [1989] B.C.J. No. 2257 (C.A.).............................. 286 Barclays Bank Ltd. v. W.J. Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd., [1979] 3 All E.R. 522 (Q.B.) ..................................... 282, 285, 294, 300, 301, 302, 303 Barclays Bank plc v. Bank of England, [1985] 1 All E.R. 385......
  • The Rise and Fall of the Mistake of Law Rule
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. III-2000, January 2000
    • 1 January 2000
    ...of these judges specified that the plaintiff must have mistakenly believed that he or she was under a liability to pay the defendant. " [1980] QB 677. Also see Saronic Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Huron Liberian Co. [1979] 1 Lloyds Rep 341, at 362-366, per Mocatta J., affirmed by the Court of Appea......
  • Spangaro v. Corporate Investment Australia Funds Management Ltd.: failure of consideration (failure of basis) as a claim in unjust enrichment.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 29 No. 2, August 2005
    • 1 August 2005
    ...and Gaudron JJ). (61) Kelly v Solari (1841) 9 M & W 54; 152 ER 24: Barclays Bank Ltd v W J Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd [1980] QB 677. See above nn 34, 36 and accompanying (62) Lipkin Gorman [1991] 2 AC 548; David Securities (1992) 175 CLR 353. (63) David Securities (1992) 175 C......
  • Get Started for Free